Talk:Princess Farahnaz Pahlavi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	Princess Farahnaz Pahlavi is part of WikiProject Iran, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Iran-related topics. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

This article was nominated for deletion on Jan 4 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

---

[edit] References

She is not the primary subject of all references added to the article. Consider the BBC link, for one. I recommend you check some of the others before I do, as I suspect the Berkshire article does not have her as the primary subject. I suspect others too do not have her as primary subject, based upon titles, as she is not the "widow", and usually titles regard the primary subject. I will check these all at some point, but for the sake of improving the article, I suggest that you go through them to make sure she is THE primary subject, according to WP:BIO.

Your source for the dam does not say that it was named after her. This is original research. See WP:OR for further details about this Wikipedia policy.

Once the references have been winnowed based upon satisfying the primary criteria of WP:BIO, the other criteria can be applied.

Simply adding references will not solve problems with this article. The references have to qualify for inclusion as well. Thanks. The Behnam 17:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

With all due respect, The Behnam, I haven't read anywhere that an article used as a reference has to be solely (or even primarily) about the Wiki subject. As long as the reference supports the assertion from the Wiki, it satisfies WP:CITE. I just stumbled upon this article, so I have no stake in it. But I think it's better to apply policy consistently, and as it is written, not just how one wishes to interpret it. Jeffpw 08:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

My comment was a long time ago, but the idea behind establishing notability is being featured as a primary subject in articles of a certain caliber (independent, reliable, etc). The Behnam 03:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)