Talk:Princess Elizabeth of Yugoslavia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please acquaint yourself with the wikipedia:naming conventions. --Jiang 00:06, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Still Jelisaveta is Serbian name which cannot be translated to Elizabeth. It is considered to be mistake. It`s not like with Petar-Peter thing. Jelisaveta-Elizabeth doesnot make any sense. Of course many webasites list her as Elizabeth but it is just copy/paste.
BTW she is not a princess. You can take a look of her family tree. She is not sister of Crown Prince. She is kneginja. It is smoething similar to countess or duchess.
So let`s call this article-Countess Jelisaveta of Serbia and Yugoslavia. According to royal serbian website they are family of Serbia and Yugoslavia even though nobody recognizes them outside of Serbia as their royal family.
Avala 19:09, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I will write that she is princess even though she is not(self-proclaimed-by rest of Karadjordjevics she is considered to be Kneginja]]. I am not sure how to translate Kneginja. Avala 19:28, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Her name in English is "Princess Elizabeth of Yugoslavia". That's the name she uses in English-speaking countries for "The Princess Elizabeth of Yugoslavia Foundation". If there are issues about what titles she's entitled to use, or the translations of titles, the issues should be addressed in the article. But the article needn't be moved each time. I've asked for further guidance at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles). - Nunh-huh 18:24, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The concensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles) is that this belongs at Princess Elizabeth of Yugoslavia. Please don't move it without discussing it there and reaching some kind of agreement. - Nunh-huh 00:51, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Again (9 July): Please don't move this page to a new title unless some kind of concensus has been formed at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles). - Nunh-huh 16:21, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)