Talk:Prince Asem bin Al Nayef

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Direct descendant?

Where are the sources that can be cited for the claim "He is the 42nd generation direct descendant of Muhammad."? Valley2city 07:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

You may view any book on the Hashemite family or any of the websites that have the online geneaology of the Jordanian Royal Family (Hashemite).

Simple research is all that is required to verify this. The family history is so well documented that extensive research is not needed.

View, for example, the offical website of the late King Hussein or King Abdullah II both contain detailed family trees.

Additionally, the non-offical but highly informative website Royal Ark is an excellent source of verified information.

Queen Brandissima - brandy.kelley@gmail.com

[edit] reason for reversion

I didn't type a reason for the previously reverted edit and since I can't edit the edit summary, here's the reason here: it still needs improvement to leave the stub category. Sure, that's opinion, but stub status is opinion in all cases. Valley2city 22:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)