Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA) is the first United States federal law passed dealing with the sexual assault of prisoners. The bill was signed into law on September 4, 2003.

Contents 1 Background 2 Support and lobby 3 Act 3.1 Provisions 3.2 Juvenile justice 3.3 Signing statement 3.4 Temporary lock-ups 4 Implementation 4.1 Grants 4.2 Federal facilities 4.3 Immigration detention centers 4.4 Juvenile facilities 4.5 Local, state and county facilities 4.6 Research and studies 5 Reaction 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links

[edit] Background

Public awareness of the phenomenon of prison rape is a relatively recent development and estimates to its prevalence have varied widely for decades. In 1974 Carl Weiss and David James Friar wrote that 46 million Americans would one day be incarcerated; of that number, they claimed, 10 million would be raped. A 1992 estimate from the Federal Bureau of Prisons conjectured that between 9 and 20 percent of inmates had been sexually assaulted. Studies in 1982 and 1996 both concluded that the rate was somewhere between 12 and 14 percent; the 1996 study, by Cindy Struckman-Johnson, concluded that 18 percent of assaults were carried out by prison staff. A 1986 study by Daniel Lockwood put the number at around 23 percent for maximum security prisons in New York. In contrast, Christine Saum's 1994 survey of 101 inmates showed 5 had been sexually assaulted.^[1]

In 2001 Human Rights Watch released a paper, titled "No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons". The release of that paper was the single event that contributed most to the passage of PREA two years later.^[2] Human Rights Watch had published several papers on the topic of prison rape in the years since its initial report on the topic in 1996. The 1996 paper "All too Familiar: Sexual Abuse of Women in U.S. State Prisons" was released during a time when there was almost no Congressional support for legislation aimed at prison rape.^[2] A 1998 attempt by Representative John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) known as the Custodial Sexual Abuse Act of 1998 was attached to the reauthorization bill for the Violence Against Women Act but summarily removed and never reintroduced.^[2]

Michael Horowitz has also been credited with playing a large part in the passage of PREA. Horowitz, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute led a part of the broad coalition of the bill's supporters.^[3]

[edit] Support and lobby

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 was supported by a broad base of activists, lobbyists, and organizations. The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission lobbied for the passage of the legislation as did the "anti-feminist" Concerned Women for America.^[4] These groups were part of a diverse coalition of human rights and religious groups which backed the legislation, other groups which supported the act were: Amnesty International USA, Focus on the Family, Human Rights Watch, the NAACP, the National Association of Evangelicals, Penal Reform International, Physicians for Human Rights, the Presbyterian Church USA, the Salvation Army and the Union of American Hebrew Congregations.^[5]

The bill was sponsored, in both houses of the U.S. Congress, by a bipartisan group of legislators. The initial sponsors of the bill in the Senate were Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and , in the House of Representatives the legislation was sponsored by Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA) and Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), who was the initial co-sponsor.^[5] The Senate bill picked up four co-sponsors on the day it was passed, they were: Senators Mike Dewine (R-OH), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Edward Kennedy (D-MA), and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).^[6] The house bill had a total of 32 co-sponsors, including Scott.^[7] The bill passed both the House and Senate by unanimous consent; it passed the Senate on July 21, 2003 and the House on July 25.^[6][8]

[edit] Act

[edit] Provisions

After the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 was passed by in both houses of the U.S. Congress it was subsequently signed by President George W. Bush in a White House ceremony on September 4, 2003.^[9][10] The act aimed to curb prison rape through a "zero-tolerance" policy, as well as through research and information gathering. The act called for developing national standards to prevent and detect incidents of sexual violence in prison, making data on prison rape more available to prison administrators as well as making corrections facilities more accountable for incidents of prison rape.^[11]

A major component of the PREA was the establishment of a "National Prison Rape Reduction Commission".^[9] The panel was established by the act and appointed in June 2004, though the law itself called for the commission's creation within 60 days of its passage.^[8].^[12] The panel, known as the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission (NPREC), was charged with undertaking a study on the comprehensive effects of prison rape and its occurences.^[8] The commission was also charged with information gathering through a variety of sources including public hearings. Eventually the commission will issue a report which includes its findings, conclusions and any recommendations.^[13]

In addition the law mandated that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) "make the prevention of prison rape a top priority in each prison system."^[8] The DOJ's Bureau of Justice Statistics was mandated to produce an annual report on its activities concerning the topic of prison rape in the U.S. prison system.^[8] The law also made several other mandates for the DOJ. The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) was ordered to offer training and technical assistance, provide a clearinghouse for information and produce its own annual report to Congress. PREA required the DOJ to create a review panel designed to conduct hearings on prison rape, this panel was given subpoena power as well. At the top of the Justice Department PREA authorized the Attorney General to dispense grant money to facilitate implementation of the act. These grants are administered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ).^[14]

Representative Danny K. Davis (D-IL) introduced the Second Chance Act of 2007 on March 20 of that year, among its provisions was an amendment to PREA. The miscellaneous provisions of what was largely a law designed to help reintegrate criminal offenders into the community, extended the existence of the NRPREC from 3 years to 5 years after its inception date.^[15] The Senate version was introduced 9 days later and sponsored by Senator Joe Biden (D-DE). The Second Chance Act passed the House 347 - 62 on November 13, 2007. The bill passed the Senate by unanimous consent on March 11, 2008 and the life of the NPREC was extended when Bush signed the Second Chance Act of 2007 on April 9, 2008.^[15]

[edit] Juvenile justice

Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.

[edit] Signing statement

Upon signing PREA President Bush issued a signing statement to accompany the law's passage.^[16][17] The signing statement specifically exempted the executive branch from two parts of section 7 of PREA.^[17] Section 7 deals with access for the NPREC to any federal department or agency's information that it deemed necessary to complete its job.^[8] The two specific sections that the signing statement allowed the executive branch to ignore if "disclosure could impair deliberative processes of the Executive or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties" were 7(h) and 7(k)3.^[17] The signing statement maintained that this was within the constitutional authority of the president.^[17]

[edit] Temporary lock-ups

PREA defines "prison" quite broadly. Within the context of the act prison is defined as, "any federal, state, or local confinement facility, including local jails, police lockups, juvenile facilities, and state and federal prisons."^[3] Thus, short-term lockups, such as holding facilities, and local jails, regardless of size, are also subject to the provisions of PREA.^[18] Failure by local authorities and operators of such facilities to comply with the provisions of PREA results in a reduction in federal funding to that agency to the tune of 5 percent for each year they fail to comply.^[18]

[edit] Implementation

[edit] Grants

PREA authorizes money in the form of grants for a wide variety of implementation associated activities. The grants can be utilized by state agencies for personnel, training, technical assistance, data collection, and equipment to prevent, investigate, and prosecute prison rape. Each state recipient is required to submit a report within 90 days laying out on what activities the money was spent on as well as the effect of those activities on prison rape within the state. In 2004 Congress appropriated US$25 million dollars for the grant program and in 2005 US$20 million. ^[19] The BJA handed out $10 million of the 2004 appropriation in the fourth quarter of that year. The largest grant amount that year, $1 million, was handed out to the Department of Corrections in Iowa, Michigan, New York, Texas and Washington.^[14]

[edit] Federal facilities

Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.

[edit] Immigration detention centers

PREA also applies to all federal immigration detention centers.^[20] In December 2006, NPREC held two days of hearings focusing on sexual violence and rape in immigration detention facilities. During the hearings they heard testimony from a female victim of sexual assault in an immigration facility as well as testimony from prison staff. The panel issued a statement reiterating that its policy of "zero-tolerance" applied to federal immigration facilities.^[21] In oral statements made by the U.S. delegation to the Committee Against Torture in 2006, Thomas Manheim with the U.S. DOJ responded to queries by Nora Sveaass about the implementation of PREA in immigration detention facilities. Some of the steps Manheim asserted Department of Homeland Security has taken included the development of a classification system to segregate violent and non-violent offenders, "widespread posting of instructions on how to report sexual misconduct", and PREA training for detention officers in the facilities.^[22]

[edit] Juvenile facilities

Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.

[edit] Local, state and county facilities

Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.

[edit] Research and studies

The U.S. Congress conservatively estimated that at least 13 percent of the inmates in the United States have been sexually assaulted in prison.^[23] Under this estimate, nearly 200,000 inmates now incarcerated have been or will be the victims of prison rape. The total number of inmates who have been sexually assaulted in the past 20 years likely exceeds 1,000,000."^[23] These numbers were derived based on the "testimony of social scientists and penologists" and as a direct result of PREA.^[23]

Another study, released in January 2006 at the behest of the U.S. government and PREA by Mark Fleisher at Case Western Reserve University showed that prison rape was rarer than estimated.^[24] Fleisher's study reported that most prisoners who claim to have been raped are looking for money, publicity, a transfer, or lying. The study was immediately questioned and disputed by members of NPREC. Both Reggie B. Walton, NPREC chair, and commissioner Cindy Struckman-Johnson spoke out against the study, with Struckman-Johnson calling it unscientific.^[24]

In December 2007 United States Department of Justice published a report about rapes and sexual violence in American prisons. The report, which included information obtained from about 1.3 million prisoners, reported 60,500 cases of sexual violence ranging from unwanted touching to rape in 2006.^[25] In total, 4.5 percent of American prisoners reported an incident of sexual violence in the study.^[25]

[edit] Reaction

The speed with which the bill passed, and the fact it was passed without public pressure has been called "surprising".^[3] PREA went through both houses in July 2003, was presented to the president on September 2, 2003 and signed two days later. Human Rights Watch urged President Bush to sign the bill, and stated that if it were implemented correctly it would "catalyze nationwide efforts to eliminate prison rape by inmates and correctional staff."^[26]

Robert Weisberg, co-writing with David Mills, argued in Slate in October 2003 that PREA did little more than collect data. They argued that the bill's original title, the "Prison Rape Reduction Act", was probably a more likely predictor of its outcome.^[27] A similar position was put forth by Mike Farrell, writing in The Huffington Post, where he stated, "the National Prison Rape Elimination Commission meets periodically to 'study the impact of prisoner rape.' While they study, rape continues."^[28]

[edit] See also

• Don't Drop the Soap
• Stop Prisoner Rape, Inc.

[edit] References

[edit] Further reading

• Beck, Allen J., et al. "Sexual Violence Reported by Correctional Authorities, 2006", (PDF), Bureau of Justice Statistics, August 2007, accessed on June 5, 2008.
• Fleisher, Mark and Krienert, Jesse. "The Culture of Prison Sexual Violence", (PDF), November 2006, National Institute of Justice, accessed June 5, 2008.
• Mariner, Joanne, et al. No Escape: Male Rape in U.S. Prisons", Human Rights Watch, 2001, ISBN 1564322580, accessed June 5, 2008.
• Ristroph, Alice, "Sexual Punishments", (Abstract w/ link to document), Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Vol. 15, No. 139, 2006, accessed June 5, 2008.
• Smith, Brenda V. and Yarussi, Jamie M. "Prosecuting Sexual Violence in Correctional Settings: Examining Prosecutors' Perceptions", (Abstract w/ link to document), Criminal Law Brief Spring 2008, American University: Washington College of Law, WCL Research Paper No. 2008-50, accessed June 5, 2008.
• Thomas, Dorothy Q., et al. "All too Familiar: Sexual Abuse of Women in U.S. State Prisons", Human Rights Watch, 1996, ISBN 1564321533, accessed June 5, 2008.

[edit] External links

• PREA - National Inst. of Corrections, National Institute of Corrections, accessed June 5, 2008.
• Prison Rape Elimination Act Resources, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, accessed June 5, 2008.
• National Prison Rape Elimination Commission, official site, accessed June 5, 2008.