Talk:Pretty Village, Pretty Flame

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

-It's october 8th 2006. I just read the article and fixed a few grammatical errors. -Zlatko

Shouldn't "muslimes" be changed to "bosniaks"? -Betel

In what way is the term bosnian muslim which is considered antiquated and, in certain situations, very offensive due to its implied religious identification, "appropraite to the period of the film"? Usually wikipedia articles refer to "Bosnian Muslims" as Bosniaks even if the individual lived while the antiquated term stil was in use. Please see Bosniak. My change was reverted without any discussion or given argument. -Betel

If "Bosniaks" is used to refer to Muslims by nationality, that is incorrect. It would be ridiculous to call the characters in the film Bosniaks when they are ethnic Muslims. The film names them as such and was made when the collective name transfer was still unclear/incomplete. There are still people today who self-identify as Muslims by nationality, so the term is not inherently offensive anyway. I don't see how using the term (which was used by the people in question themselves until 15 years ago) in a historical context can possibly offensive. To not use it would be misleading and inaccurate. --estavisti 23:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

As a bosniak myself I really do not care if people call me Bosniak or Muslim. I am proud of my ethnicity and neither would be insulting. One should be proud of his or her ethnicity and religion. Thanks, Vseferović 19:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Wasn't that truck driver from Sweden? --212.247.27.181 14:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Does anyone know much about the music in the movie? --212.247.27.49 15:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Wasn't Laza Veljuskas brother-in-law? --212.247.27.49 22:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

What is it Brzi says when Velja shoots himself? It sounds something like: "kkk ah kako sime sajbu ah kkk aaah majku ti jebem salf

aahahaha kako sime sajvu majkut helem zalisku" --212.247.27.17 00:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The language from this film has nothing with Croats and Croat language.
Don't mess Croats with this. Kubura 07:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Regarding the category Category:Serbo-Croatian-language films 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg 3 Serbian Denial 4 Title Translation 5 Fair use rationale for Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg

[edit] Regarding the category Category:Serbo-Croatian-language films

As per latest removal of category, I understand that the latest coment is related to this. The category says Serbo-Croatian language not Croatian, so I returned it. --Biblbroks's talk 00:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg

Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Serbian Denial

This article should also point out the fact that this movie is part of what prevents the Serbs and the people of Serbia to understand that Serbian Politics and Militants are were the main aggressors and instigators of the war. It is just another way that keeps Serbia from accepting it's crimes. This is a another pathetic, propagandic attempt for Serbs to rationalize the war as "all sides were aggressors and equally guilty"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.242.107 (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

This movie is based on actual events.

I know about the so called based on the true event and its nothing like in this movie. Like my friend sinebot said Serb propaganda and not accepting their crimes

The thing is...I was there and you were not. This movie has nothing to do with who started the war and even less with who was right in it and who was not. And as a matter of fact I think that it showed all the sides in bad light. What Serbs have to understand is that Milosevic IS the man responsible for a big part of what happened during the 90's war and what Croatians have to remind themselves is how much suffering they brought onto the Serbian population in the Second World War, and that emotions from then were never overcome.

P.S I corrected your typo of Moovie to Movie.

[edit] Title Translation

The Serbian language can be written in cyrillic or latin script. Instead of the translation categorization of "Serbian: Лепа села лепо горе", it would be more correct to categorize as simply "Serbian: Лепа села лепо горе, Lepa Sela Lepo Gore", as is the case for many other Serbian film title translations on WIkipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.70.130 (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg

Image:Lepaselalepogore.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)