From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading. |
[edit] Vote against for merge
I'm guessing that the merge suggestion has a mistake in it and what was meant may be that Prelude to War be merged into "Why We Fight." As the tag stands it is nonsensicle, reading: "it has been suggested that the section or article <prelude to War> be merged into Prelude to War."
I put this article together from a bare-bones stub, but I used Why We Fight for some of the material, and it's still a stub, so merging this article into it, as it presently stands would not be outlandish.
However, is Why We Fight going to have a full treatment for each of the movies in the series? Many articles try to split off discrete segements. Why We Fight is composed of six separate movies and this particular one is an academy award winner.
While I find, for instance, the ten thousand distinct articles on every bit of minutia from every scene of every Star Wars movie to be unencylopedic and a wholesale failure to recognize some tipping point of ridiculousness that should be reached when splitting articles into ever smaller and smaller subjects, I think a full movie is deserving of its own separate article. --Fuhghettaboutit 05:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- The merger is from "Prelude To War" into "Prelude to War". There are now two articles on the same film with uppercase and lowercase "t". -- User:Docu
- D'oh! Fairly new here. I see. Standing in corner with dunce cap on. Of course they should be merged. I'll leave my text above intact as an archive of asininity. --Fuhghettaboutit 15:45, 31 December 2005 (UTC)