Talk:Praxis (process)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Why the tag?
This article actually seems quite good and can't see why it merits a cleanup flag.
While could use some improvement, it seem unjustified to just go around flagging everything that isn't perfect - especially with no explanation.
Hans Joseph Solbrig 21:08, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] This article should be expanded on
The current article is not necessarily wrong, but it is lacking. Praxis is a word rich in history and theory and it should be explored more thoroughly in this article. For instance, the origins of the word are not described and its applications (which are many and complex) are somewhat glossed over. 142.58.123.6 19:16, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] It's a stub, no?
I agree with the commenter just before me, hence I think this article should be tagged as a stub rather than as a candidate for cleanup. Some of what is there should be reworked for greater clarity and elegance, and the over-emphasis on educators' particular usage of praxis should be corrected. The more serious problem, however, is that the article is far, far too spare to adequately address the concept of praxis.
Franziska 04:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
I think there should be a reference or link to Dyspraxia in the context of motor planning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyspraxia
"...The word "dyspraxia" comes from the Greek words "dys" meaning bad and "praxis", meaning action or deed"
more specifically to Praxis as defined in the sense of a function of the brain and organization of self.
http://spectrumcenter.net/dyspraxia.html http://www.listenandlearn.com.au/type/dyspraxia.htm
KevinGomez 23:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)