Talk:Prétear

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
To-do list for Prétear:
  • Expand Prétear Plot
  • Add Audience information, (is this aimed at boys/girls, is it a romance, is it a comedy, etc)
  • Create a section on Creatures of Prétear
    • Tipi
    • Demon larvae
    • Demonic butterflies
  • Manga
  • Differences between anime and manga (if any)

Contents

[edit] Pronounciation

Is Leafe pronounced Leaf? In the anime is was pronounced like Li-Fei...

In the English version it sounds like Leaf-ay whereas the Japanese version pronounces it more like Leaf. --Miss Ethereal 23:15, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hmm... I checked the Japanese Wikipedia page, and it has Leafe Knights written as リーフェナイツ Rīfe Naitsu. That's not pronounced like "leaf" (which would be リーフ Rīfu). The dub is probably not exact either, though, as it probably should be sound a bit more like "leaf-eh" than "leaf-ay". I'll have to check the Japanese version out again to see how I hear it. EmperorBrandon 23:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

I clearly heard it at リーフェ(Leaf-ay/Leaf-eh) in the DVDs I have (on the Japanese audio track). I am going to remove the note on the dub/pronunciation 72.207.45.14 02:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Characters

Template:Spoiler Hi, I was adding some info into the Character Bios and was going to put in their age when I noticed on the ADV character page for Hayate, that he has a presumed age of 18... in the anime they refer to Takako being the Pretear 16 years ago... unless I really misunderstood. Does this seem wrong to anyone else? --Miss Ethereal 02:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Maybe the Leafe Knights age differently? Weren't they in some sort of stasis for a while after the incident with Takako? (of course the three "replacement" ones had to age during that time). The "presumed age" there probably just means the age they appear to be, regardless of actual age. I don't think ADV just made that information up (particularly with information like birthday and favorite drink there). They probably had access to some sort of official material. EmperorBrandon 02:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
In the manga, it says the knights who weren't killed lost a lot of energy and were reverted back to the form of babies, which was why Hayate is (approximately) the same age as Himeno. Perhaps this holds true for the anime as well? Yumecosmos 19:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm actually second guessing the information on the official ADV page, considering that the page itself is somewhat inconsistent. For instance, Go is spelled Goh and Go on the Character summary pages. I thought that they might be in some sort of stasis or something as well, since at the beginning of the first episode, Hayate had to summon the other nights... but I'm not sure. For now, I'm electing not to put their ages up. --Miss Ethereal 03:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
I think they had his name spelled as "Goh" when they did the cast guessing game on the AnimeOnDVD forums, too, though it's "Go" thoughout the DVD release. Probably were going to romanize him as "Goh" first and then changed it later (sometimes they have to do those kind of things because the Japanese licensor asks for it). EmperorBrandon 04:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:Endspoiler

On a further note, having watched this series a third time, I thought I'd try my hand at writing up character information for this series. If there's any comments, just let me know but please don't yell at me as I'm still new at this!  :P Thanks. --Miss Ethereal 02:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:Spoiler Mind if I add some manga information on Takako and Natsue? Things like: in the manga Natsue is the princess of disaster, Takako is dead, and Takako and Hayate actually dated for a while rather than him rejecting her. I think those are differences worth mentioning in the character sections themselves rather than in a separate "differences" section. Yumecosmos 19:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Template:Endspoiler

[edit] Original title...

While the article includes the original Japanese title, it doesn't mention the translation of that title - something that once I found out, totally changed the way I saw the show, so I think it should say it. Namely, "New Snow White's Legend", by one translation anyway. Once seeing that, it inspired all sorts of revelations, such as "wait, how many knights are there...? Ohhhhh..." :) But anyway, that translation is pretty backwards for English, so I didn't add it myself... but I don't know Japanese myself to translate it to a more standard phrasing. Could someone suggest something? -Goldom (t) (Review) 03:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Prétear if the official title of the series. I've added the nihongo template to include the official english title, the kanji, the romanji, and the alternative English title Prétear - The New Legend of Snow White. --Miss Ethereal 04:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
That's about what I was looking for. Thanks. -Goldom (t) (Review) 15:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PreDVD.jpg

Image:PreDVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:PreDVD.jpg

Image:PreDVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)