User talk:Poyoyloar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here.

[edit] Sockpuppetry for User:ArchieHall

I noticed that you accused User:ArchieHall of sockpuppetry, a comment that which was later deleted by the user. If this is a serious allegation and you can back it up with evidence (similar editing patterns to another user using diffs), I recommend you bring it up at WP:SSP, but please ask me if you have any questions. --Nsevs • Talk 17:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

"But if it helps your 'paranoia', your article was pointed out to me by an anonymous editor. If you'd like I can refer you to him/her if you truly believe you are being harrassed." - Yes, I'd like you to refer me to him/her. Appreciated, thank you.ArchieHall (talk) 22:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Nope, still not Mike Watt (singular, no "S" - you might like to spell check the names of the people you persecute). I'd recommend you also google the name "Douglas Waltz" and see that he's another writer in the industry. If you want to be wrong: there it is. Now, I'm bored of fighting you. You win. I'll contact Mike and tell him I'm throwing in the towel. Delete whatever you like. Report whatever you like. Go to sleep tonight feeling righteous and justified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchieHall (talk • contribs) 00:09, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Mike, look... you are obviously new to these parts. Notice how you were admonished for your NEW personal attack against me? Yes, I'm refering to the NEW "Dwaltzwriter" account you just created. This is called sockpuppetry, which means creating phony accounts pretending to be different people when really the same person (you) are using accounts to further your own POV agenda. And the fact that somebody just happened to create the Dwaltzwriter account to jump into an argument about deleting an account pretty much proves that you are manipulating multiple accounts to create a sense that a community (of one) is actually supporting this argument. This is very childish. I can guess what your next excuse is... that it is a friend of Ms. Best or Mr. Watts. That violation falls under meatpuppetry since getting your friends to create accounts to back a POV argument with the illusion of chance is an attempt to 'game' the system to support your argument. Fair warning: I will now report all your sockpuppet accounts. Hopefully, I'm wrong since I'd rather be wrong about this. If right, then this will create a harder time for you to justify the legitimacy of your Mike Watt article since it really is starting to look like you are trying to blantantly advertise yourself. Poyoyloar (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Just so you know, you did not sucessfully complete the nomination process at [[WP:SSP]. I have taken care of that for you. As well, I would like to remind you about WP:AGF and WP:BITE... The way to handle situations like this is to keep a cool head, present the facts at the appropriate noticeboard, and let them speak for themselves. You don't need to admonish users on their talk pages, and comments like "This is very childish" and warnings like "this will create a harder time for you to justify the legitimacy of your Mike Watt article" border on WP:CIVIL. There are standardized sockpuppet, AfD, and notability warning notices available, and I suggest you avail yourself of those.

At the same time, I do want to thank you for staying with this despite all the bumps in the road. It IS important to follow up with these things, but it's MORE important to take the high road with cases like these. They come along far too often to treat them any other way. Thanks again, Nsevs • Talk 11:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Dwaltzwriter here. I looked this over and see in my previous comments in which I was standing up for Amy Lynn Best, that at no time did I use any form of personal attack against anyone. I am tired of being accused of being someone else. Why is when I create an account being brought into question? Aren't we supposed to speak up for things that we feel strongly about. Here, I'll make this easy for you. I currently write for the following websites; Askew Reviews, Cult Cuts, Groovy Age Of Horror, Penguin Comics under the name Douglas Waltz because, well that's my name. I have never been a real fan of anonymity. Perhaps Poyoyloar could keep these things in mind before he goes off on an individual who has done nothing, but state an opinion.Dwaltzwriter (talk) 17:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

You and I both know that you are ArchieHall, or a meatpuppet of ArchieHall. Even if you are not "ArchieHall"(aka. Mike Watt), then you are admitting to meatpuppetry... which means you are friend of ArchieHall jumping in at his request to defend his contributions. This is NEVER allowed. And pretending that you just randomly created this account, just when this editwar was occuring, is patently absurd. Clearly you are working with ArchieHall, or you ARE "ArchieHall." In either case, it is bannable offences. Nice try, Mr. Mike Watt.Poyoyloar (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

My account was created in October of last year. Check it! I didn't 'randomly' create this account. I signed up so, if the need arose I could edit content. Period. Being a film critic and quite knowledgeable in film it could happen. I've said it before and I'll say it agian. My name is Douglas Waltz and I am a film critic of over ten years. The very notion that you are trying to ban an actress that has been in films that are available on both web sites and brick and mortar storefronts as non notable, is offensive in the highest degree. Who are you to decide what is notable and non notable. Sounds like opinion to me and not very encyclopedic of you, sir. And now you are deleting comments that have to be replaced? Hmmmm.Dwaltzwriter (talk) 02:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Mike, I don't care when you created this account. I don't care how many fake accounts you create. We are all human. We all misbehave. I'm just happy that those articles will inevitably be gone. And that's for doing your part to 'assure' that will happen. You make a case for deleting those articles better than I ever could. Thanks for that buddy!Poyoyloar (talk) 02:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

TOOL!Dwaltzwriter (talk) 18

21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism on User talk:Nsevs

Do not remove others' comments on talk pages, as you did here and here. Doing so is considered vandalism, and these comments have been restored. You will be blocked if you continue. --Nsevs • Talk 15:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

And here. You can only remove others' comments from your own talk page or when they are blatant vandalism (an encouragement to be civil does not qualify).--Nsevs • Talk 15:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Poyoyloar you have been blocked one week, socks indef. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)