Talk:PowerJet SaM146

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

Article not objective or written in a professional manner.

"CFM56 - the world’s most reliable and economical jet." - a statement like this needs support. If the CFM56 is so economical and reliable why does anyone buy Airbus 320's with IAE V2500 engines? Why should the IAE V2500 have a 56% market share on A320's in the last ten years when a) it is not available on the A318 and b) Air France, a major A320 customer, has no choice in its engine selection? Why do RR, GE and P&W bother with newer designs?

[edit] I tried to do a clean-up on it.

This was actually worse than an ad - it read like a press release. And a pretty crappy one.

bwob —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwob (talkcontribs) 11:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I thought I did a passable job of fixing this.

I did what I thought was a reasonable clean-up job on this, but the big "This article or section is written like an advertisement" warning and orange exclamation mark is still there. Didn't I slice and dice it enough? Bwob 09:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duh-uh, I figured it out

I didn't realise I could remove the 'advert' warning. Thought somebody in WikipediaCentral had to do it. I'm awake...

Bwob 09:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)