Template talk:POV-statement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Style
I think it is a bit too small and the brackets are too close to the text -- Snailwalker | talk 13:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- If you look at my original version, in the history, you may wish to adapt it. Computerjoe's talk 19:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah I like that one better, but it would be nice to have someone else comment on this -- Snailwalker | talk 19:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- It was edited by User:HereToHelp as it was too lengthy. Perhaps a change to 'neutrality disputed. see talk.'? Computerjoe's talk 20:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah I like that one better, but it would be nice to have someone else comment on this -- Snailwalker | talk 19:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Bracket spacing can be adjusted with
 (thin space). For example, [ neutrality disputed ]. Thin spaces are sometimes used around em dashes. I don't know how compatible they are across browsers. Experiment and see. — mjb 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk Page
Since this is of line-item use, maybe it should take a parameter to point to a talk page section, rather than just pointing to the whole talk page?
I know it's hard to maintain the section links, if the sections of the talk page change, but I'd think if someone was taking the time to archive a talk page, that these would either be gone, replaced by a page dispute/pov, or be archived along with it.
If my suggestion comes to fruition, here is some language for the usage section:
To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{POV-statement|talk page section name}}. |
[edit] Wikiproject Inline templates proposed
Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Inline templates. I've been meaning to do this for a while. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 16:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category
Any objection changing the category here to Category:Articles with minor POV problems like the other inline neutrality templates?--BirgitteSB 17:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
