Talk:Pound-Rebka experiment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Does this experiment actually provide evidence for general relativity? My GR lecturer made a point of saying that it doesn't. Instead it is an experiment to see if the local inertial frames of Newtonian theory and special relativity coincide.
Pages 101~103 here : http://people.pwf.cam.ac.uk/gjw33/Lecture%20Notes/Mathematics%20Tripos%20Notes/Part%20III/General%20Relativity%20(III)/Sections%209~13.pdf elaborate on what his views are. --AlphaNumeric 12:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Of course it is evidence for General Relativity. If the experiment had shown no gravitational redshift, then GR would've been up the creek.
- That said, what the experiment really measures is gravitational redshift. Special relativity as usually formulated does not try to predict the effects of gravity, but if you were to guess based on SR and Newton's gravity, you'd pretty much have to guess the same amount of redshift that GR predicts.
- So although the experiment gives evidence for this (rather striking) effect of GR, it doesn't really distinguish between SR and GR. Nor is it intended to. Fortunately, other experiments -- such as the deflection of light by the sun -- fill that role adequately enough.
- - 18.252.6.96 06:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why the Pound Rebka et al experiment ought to be repeated. First of two reasons. SdeHJ
The original experiment did not monitor the polarization (spin) states of the light entering and the light leaving the experiment. It can be argued in analogy to the known interaction of a spin 1/2 electron with a spin 1 photon wherein the electron changes its spin state from (say) -1/2 to spin state +1/2 that the spin 1 photon might interact with the (argued elsewhere) hypothetical spin 2 graviton by "reversing" its spin 2 units (h), which would show up as a change of the light's polarization state. Refer to http://www.bosonics.net How does Gravitation Really Work?
[edit] great job
fantastic and well thought out/written, nice work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.127.44 (talk) 06:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] references are behind paywall
Find new ones that aren't or remove links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crusty007 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)