Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 May 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< May 6 May 8 >

Contents

[edit] May 7

[edit] Image:Rasaqroyalgreen2007.jpg

Tag claims both authorship of image and sources it to a website. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CBC-crest.gif

It matches the logo at http://www.cbstraining.com/ GreenJoe 05:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment - It doesn't, actually. asenine say what? 18:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Fair use can probably be claimed. Stifle (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

It does not match the image. This is way more bigger and high res then the website image, he probably did make it. (Icedog (talk) 22:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC))

  • Kept, looks like it to me too. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
    • It doesn't matter who made it, Canadian Business College retains copyright of any derivative works made of its coat of arms. I changed the license to {{non-free logo}} and added a use rationale. C'mon, people! Kelly hi! 00:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jeremiah Wright Dec 1961 Boot Camp Graduation.jpg

Portraits of US Military Personnel, not officially released by the military, are not automatically public domain. The photographer is not stated to be a Marine Corps / US Government employee by the source and only states that the image was provided by Jeremiah Wright not that it is public domain. Boot camp photographs are purchased by the photographed person, or their family, and that person owns the image and its copyright, not the US Government. — Dual Freq (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC).

Additionally, these photos are frequently taken by private contractors (the same sort of firms that do kids' school pictures) and the graduates purchase the photos directly from them, and the photographers retain copyright. Unless a source can be shown that this is a government photo, it should be considered copyrighted. Kelly hi! 14:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Logo10.jpg

Is a non-free logo of an institution,it matches the one on the website,and is licensed inappropriately. — Amog |Talk 14:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Please reconsider as a fair use rationale has been provided. Rohit Reddy™ (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
The image will not be deleted. However do not use the image anywhere except the infobox in it's article. - Amog |Talk 09:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Stealing sign.jpg

The image is a promotional photo, clearly not PD. asenine say what? 18:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:EIIR-Can-1957.jpg

Only PD if the photographer died within a year of taking the photo -- doubtful — --Padraic 19:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jns.jpg

Umm... not used anywhere on en-Wikipedia, doesn't appear to have any use, and doesn't have a copyright tag. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 21:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Penisunderside.jpg

Not used anywhere, no description, no copyright tag. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 21:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MasielaLusha07.png

No evidence the uploader took this image, small size and lack of Metadata is very suspicious. Polly (Parrot) 22:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Main studio net1.jpg

Looks like a promotional image. No proof that uploader is copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CheNuevara navbar.jpg

Contains Wikipedia logo, Mexico's seal, and the Firefox logo. Definitely not PD. asenine say what? 23:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll fix it and upload a GFDL-compliant version; no need for process wonkery. - Revolving Bugbear 16:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Image now complies with the second (although not the first) clause of the {{PD}} template. - Revolving Bugbear 18:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)