Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 May 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< May 17 May 19 >

Contents

[edit] May 18

[edit] Image:BW small by CoCo Carmel.jpg

Uploader says "Photo by CoCo Carmel April 2008" and release it with a self template. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Biancazoo3.png

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Apparently a screenshot. Kelly hi! 03:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Yanez.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 03:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Female_Goddess.jpg

Pleas help us with the copyright and sourcing. Thank You. Obrasocial Bancaja gave us the permission to upload this image on Wikipedia, the source is La espiritualidad del vacio Khmer sculpture exhibition catalogue, Matthias Barmann, Felice delle Piane, Obrasocial Bancaja, Valencia, Spain. Liguria (talk) 19:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Obrasocial Bancaja gave us the permission to upload this image on Wikipedia, the source is La espiritualidad del vacio Khmer sculpture exhibition catalogue, Matthias Barmann, Felice delle Piane, Obrasocial Bancaja, Valencia, Spain. 82.71.64.54 (talk) 19:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC) We do not know how to upload this image but it just comes from a catalogue and we have the permission to upload it on wikipedia. Liguria (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC) we will upload the image again with the correct source. Liguria (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC) No evidence to support free license of photo. Kelly hi! 05:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

  • reason|this image is ok and has been permitted, we have the permission to put in on wikipedia. 82.71.64.54 (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Another exact copy has been uploaded as Image:Female Goddess 2.jpg, this time under a claim the image is self made. Kelly hi! 23:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
      • User's upload log shows a claim that previous versions of this image were stated to have come from a Spanish art catalog. Kelly hi! 23:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
      • "used with permission" is listed as a reason for speedy deletion, see WP:CSD I3. It isn't good enough that the owner of the catalog gave you permission to upload for wikipedia. The owner has to release the image under the terms of a free license, and this has to be documented (either though an official, online source, or through the OTRS system). -Andrew c [talk] 20:40, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Some more info. The image depicts a piece of art that is older than 100 years, however the piece of art is not 2D, but instead 3D. Also, the photograph uses unique cropping, lighting, backdrop, and perspective. So my question to the image experts, does {{PD-art}} work in this case or not?-Andrew c [talk] 21:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • PD-art wouldn't work since the subject of the photograph is a three dimensional image; PD-art only covers photographs of other 2D works older than 100 years. {{PD-art-3d}} deals with 3D subjects, but that won't work either, since a photograph of a 3D work of art generates a new copyright. In this situation, the photo itself is a copyright of the museum, and the museum itself would have to release the image under GFDL, CC, or PD (as mentioned above). — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Carmen_Barajas_1969.JPG

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 06:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sıla gençoğlu.jpg

Pulled from host-site Imageshack, uploader has no grounds to claim GFDL, not to mention that the image appears to be part of a photoshoot of the singer. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 16:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MarkHonorarydoctorate.jpg

Permission claimed, but no OTRS ticket. Kelly hi! 18:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Grenville_gallo.jpg

No evidence of free license. Kelly hi! 18:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Slidel-magi.jpg

Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 19:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:UDR political poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was retagged. Wizardman 22:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

No indication of why the uploader would be the copyright holder. This should be a non-free image and removed from userspace then. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. It should be relicensed as a fair use image. --John (talk) 18:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I have now amended the image and the licensing tags to conform with policy. --John (talk) 18:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Image:Bigsmile.jpg

Appears unfree for a famous person: cf. [1] The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WQ0I0972c.jpg

see above The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SitaraHewitt.jpg

see above The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SitaraHewitt1.jpg

see above The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PortraitSitaraHewitt.jpg

see above The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Distortedpenguins.jpg

Appears professional (watermarked): other images from same user which are copyrighted of the same band The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:200north.jpg

Appears professional: other images from same user which are copyrighted. The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bizarrostarterkit.jpg

not free: see description on page link at bottom. The Evil Spartan (talk) 23:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Helene Whitney.JPG

Actress retired in 1940; appears to be either uploaded from a website or a screen capture of a TV screen (or a photo of a TV screen). — — iridescent 00:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I would sugguest to keep the image. It is fine. -20yearoldboyfromNY.

If it is a screen capture from a television or other, how do you have the right to claim ownership of the image? Also, you claim to have downloaded it...again, how can you claim ownership? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 03:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)