Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 March 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< March 29 March 31 >

Contents

[edit] March 30

[edit] Image:Leasalonga.jpg

Image from a copyrighted website, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 00:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:5e 3.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art-life-70}}, but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 03:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

It's unlikely, but {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} might apply to some of these. Do you know if any of the paintings were reprinted before 1923? —Remember the dot (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Akva.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art-life-70}}, but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 03:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kliun composition e.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art-life-70}}, but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kliun faces.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art-life-70}}, but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kliun construction.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art-life-70}}, but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 04:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:008_08.JPG

Derivative of 2D art, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 04:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

License changed to {{non-free 2D art}} Kelly hi! 05:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ptarch.jpg

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tagged {{PD-old}}, but according to our article the artist Lyubov Popova died in 1924, which was only 84 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 04:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Kept as {{PD-old-70}}. —Remember the dot (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[edit] Image:--Iran.svg

Derivative work of copyrighted logo. — Kelly hi! 04:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC).

Retagged, take a look, and slow down. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
No, this isn't copyrighted in America. Iranian copyright is void in the United States. The "has to be free in US and country of origin" rule only applies to Commons AFAIK. ViperSnake151 17:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, Wikipedia recognizes those copyrights even if the U.S. doesn't. See WP:PD#Countries without copyright treaties with the U.S.. Kelly hi! 23:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bo ryan the man.jpg

Uploader unlikely to hold the copyright, possibly unfree and probably meant for vandalism. This image got my attention since the uploader described the subject of the image as also a "professional vampire" on the image description page[1], and then vandalised the article of the subject by stating that he has "not once seeing his reflection".[2] — Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Found duplicate here. Image URL reveals it's a Getty image. MSNBC seems to sort their image directory by the company who took the picture. See the credit for the first picture in this article and its URL - both have "Getty". Likewise, see the credits for the AP picture here and its URL, which has "AP Mega Sports", the division of AP that provides multimedia services. Notice the pattern? It's definitely a copyrighted picture and should be deleted. We can easily find a replaceable free use picture. BlueAg09 (Talk) 04:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hogosch.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art}}, which refers to a "copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years"; but according to our article the artist Hugo Scheiber was still alive in 1933, which was only 75 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kkliun.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art}}, which refers to a "copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years"; but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 04:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kkliun 001.jpg

Tagged {{PD-art}}, which refers to a "copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years"; but according to our article the artist Ivan Kliun died in 1942, which was only 66 years ago. —Bkell (talk) 04:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WY2T1673 royalist v pd.jpg

As pointed out here, the uploader probably doesn't own the copyright for this image. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: The name of the uploading acount, Desk1 (talk · contribs) matches the name of the book's author and publisher, Des Kilfeather. Further, Desk1 repeatedly claimed to be Des Kilfeather and to have taken the pictures himself [3]. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, I had originally brought the topic up myself, but after a closer look I agree with Someguy1221 that everything seems to indicate that the uploader is indeed the copyright holder. There's also an e-mail address on the image page, but of course I don't know if it's still being used. --Ibn Battuta (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Kept. Garion96 (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:LucienDurosoiratage28.jpg

Tagged {{PD-self}}; summary is "made it myself, no copyright". This is a photograph of Lucien Durosoir, apparently when he was 28 years old, which means that it was taken about 1906. This almost certainly means it's in the public domain, but without knowing when and where it was first published, it's hard to say which public domain tag should be used. The current tag, {{PD-self}}, is probably not appropriate (unless the uploader can show he or she was the photographer who took this photo 102 years ago). —Bkell (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ees_main.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 05:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Srilamhe.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 05:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:09lux.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 05:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sriwed1.JPG

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 05:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:111Sqn_shoulder_patch.jpg

Derivative work. Kelly hi! 05:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Just so you'd know, this image is not readily available anywhere except at an Republic of Singapore Air Force OPEN HOUSE, those you might find at the official Republic of Singapore Air Force website are too small to be decipherable. Please read what I posted in the image description page before you jump your guns and get too trigger happy here. Thank you. -- Dave1185 (talk) 15:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
It's fixed now. Kelly hi! 23:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1976_Leaving_BsAs.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 06:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Greater_Angel.JPG

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 07:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TP_Press_pic.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 07:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:TGW1.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 08:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:John Howard May 2006 bw.png

I doubt that this editor is the copyright holder of this image and therefore cannot release it to the public domain Mattinbgn\talk 09:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:A2591arial.JPG

It is unlikely the uploader was the creator of this work. MER-C 10:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WEST_END.jpg

Highly unlikely uploader is the copyright holder, watermarked. MER-C 12:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Historic_West_End_Atlanta.jpg

Highly unlikely uploader is the copyright holder, watermarked. MER-C 12:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gordon_theatre.jpg

Highly unlikely uploader is the copyright holder, watermarked. MER-C 12:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Presbyterian_Church.jpg

Highly unlikely uploader is the copyright holder, watermarked. MER-C 12:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Joel_Chandler.jpg

Looks like a newspaper clipping => unfree. MER-C 12:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:432yana.jpg

Source does not exist + it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. Mspraveen (talk) 13:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:VARSHA USGAONKAR 1.jpg

Going by this user's reputation and looking at the artistic quality of the image, I believe that the image was wrongly attributed with GFDL licensing. — Mspraveen (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SarahKramer-pinkbackground.jpg

very similar to [4] but I couldn't find the exact image on the website (site may be NSFW) MECU≈talk 16:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jade_Kwan_001s_.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jae_at_Yabu_1.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jamesfreir.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Holly_Weber_Headshot1.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Holly_Weber_Crochet_Bikini1.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MichelleMcCoolPicture.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 17:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nat_nude.png

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. (not work safe) Kelly hi! 18:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Paru.jpg

I don't quite believe that the uploader is the copyright holder. Looks like it has been taken from another source. — Mspraveen (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I beleive the same too. The pic seems to be taken by some professionals for other uses. uploader has to submit the proof of Copyrights, otherwise it'll breach wiki sstandards. (Nubin_wiki (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Image:Wedge_sex_pillow.jpg

No evidence of GFDL license at given source. Kelly hi! 18:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rob.jpg

Uploaded with the summary "A picture of Robbie Engelquist.", unfortunately it overwrite an existing image so we only have the license info from the first image, wich was in turn overwritten by something else. There are like 3 distinctly different images in the history stack here, that's what you get for using a generic name I guess. Anyway I reverted to the version of the image that seems to relate to the article it's currenty used it but there is basicaly no copyright info here. Needs an update and the exess versions needs to be purged. Sherool (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Centigradz.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 22:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lsv logo.png

Uploader claims to be copyright holder of the image, even though it's the logo of a supposed secret society. When I asked them on their Talk page how they can be the copyright holder, they removed my question without response. Corvus cornixtalk 23:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

  • I tried to delete it but the option isn't available to me. Please delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueGold73 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Estherlai.png

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 23:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)