Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 March 13
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] March 13
[edit] Image:Pict0006.jpg
copyrighted images from the same source (as this image) have been previously removed from wikipedia as its licensing is incompatible with GDFL license. (no right to create derivative works) Ohconfucius (talk) 09:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pavlik.JPG
The image is tagged as being copyrighted and the copyright holder only requires attribution. A source is not provided, I found a source for the image that list the copyright as belonging the photographer listed on image's summary/ Associated Press. There is no indication on that page that the image is licensed as the uploader claimed. BlueAzure (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:LogoHC.jpg
Logo of a college, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 01:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:AN-04pic.jpg
The image is tagged as pd-usgov, but the source is the website of Northern Virginia Community College, which is not part of the United States Federal government. BlueAzure (talk) 01:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Napoleon Brie.jpg
Screenshot of a copyrighted TV series, uploaded as public domain. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- This image might as well be deleted, as the relevant article no longer exists in any case. Anglo-Norman (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SuperSmashBrosBrawlMarioFinalSmashPart2-Darkhyp-.jpg
Screenshot from a copyrighted video game, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SuperSmashBrosBrawlMarioFinalSmashPart3-Darkhyp-.jpg
Screenshot from a copyrighted video game, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SuperSmashBrosBrawlMarioFinalSmashPart1-Darkhyp-.jpg
Screenshot from a copyrighted video game, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 01:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SuperSmashBrosBrawlSmashBallResized-Darkhyp-.jpg
Screenshot from a copyrighted video game, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 01:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SuperSmashBrosBrawlSmashBall-Darkhyp-.jpg
Screenshot from a copyrighted video game, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 01:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pafsabres np s.jpg
The image is tagged pd-pakistan, which is for photos that are over 50 years old. The source of the image does not mention when the photo was taken. BlueAzure (talk) 01:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:SuperSmashBrosBrawlMarioFinalSmashPart4-Darkhyp-.jpg
Screenshot from a copyrighted video game, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 02:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Doolittle1.jpg
Dated 1945 - No indication as to death of photogrpaher thus potentialy invalid GFDL claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- It seems as though this is a likely case of {{PD-USGov-Military}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The photographer was my father, and he died in 1992. Should I state on the image that the photographer is now deceased? Googie man (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes.. If he's a direct relation say so. BTW Did he leave you the copyright in the image? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- He gave the pictures to me outright, and I think it's safe to assume that the copyright is implied in that. Googie man (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes.. If he's a direct relation say so. BTW Did he leave you the copyright in the image? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The photographer was my father, and he died in 1992. Should I state on the image that the photographer is now deceased? Googie man (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- File a note with the permissions queue at OTRS and once done, feel free to remove the PUI tags on relevant images :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- No thank you, I've done enough to defend the legitimacy of this image. If anyone deletes it, or Wikipedia doesn't want it anymore, I don't really care. It's a shame though, it's an image of significant historical value. Googie man (talk) 23:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- File a note with the permissions queue at OTRS and once done, feel free to remove the PUI tags on relevant images :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Image:JimmyDoolittleAutographed.jpg
Invlaid GFDL claim - Owning the photo isn't the same as owning the copyright in the photo or signature Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Jimmy Doolittle autographed this photo for his good friend, who was my father. I'm a long time contributor to Wikipedia, so please assume good faith. Googie man (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- It seems as though this is a likely case of {{PD-USGov-Military}}. The signature is incidental and not relevant to the copyright of the image. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Eiffel_Tower_1945.jpg
Was GFDL claim(removed) - Owning photo does not imply you own the copyright Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- This photograph was taken by my father, and I inherited it from him after his death, so I would say that does make me the copyright owner. Googie man (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- It seems as though this is a likely case of {{PD-USGov-Military}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:WorldSeriesRing.jpg
Invlaid GFDL-cliam - No indication original photogrpaher agreed Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- The guy who took the photo is fine with it being on Wikipedia. I don't know where else Wikipedia will get a free image of a World Series ring, so please do not take this down.
- I think the issue is more likely the copyrighted design of the ring itself. The photograph of the ring has minimal creative input. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Now I understand about the copyright of the design. I disagree with you, however, about the creative input.
- I think the issue is more likely the copyrighted design of the ring itself. The photograph of the ring has minimal creative input. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The guy who took the photo is fine with it being on Wikipedia. I don't know where else Wikipedia will get a free image of a World Series ring, so please do not take this down.
[edit] Image:Set_the_Controls.jpg
Concert Image - No indication uploader is photographer Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Uploader is photographer, and I've made this clear on the photograph now. Googie man (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Resolved- Image moved to Commons Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Image:Mariahpenthouse1.JPG
Taken from the internet from a photo shoot. I've seen it before, but can't remember where. Uploader claim it's self-made. Orane (talk) 14:38, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jkavner.PNG
No indication uploader is the original photographer, cropped from a bigger image featuring the six main members of the cast of The Simpsons. Gran2 19:48, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:20K.jpg
copyrighted logo, uploader does not hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 20:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Frandoggie-smstick.jpg
Looks like a movie screenshot, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 21:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Frandoggie-smstick.jpg
Excuse me - LOOK at the image - it's not even a picture of any sort - it's sketched ...now please restore it ...simply because you object to the woman's sexy pose doesn't mean you should throw untrue statements into the mix. Reality Maker —Preceding comment was added at 22:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Psmith keys in france.jpg
Image from a copyrighted website, no evidence that the GNU license is correct. Polly (Parrot) 22:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Gonzi sworn as Malta PM.jpg
Image likely from a press clipping. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:PN Victory 2008.jpg
Image likely from a press clipping. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:John Dalli.jpg
Image is obviously a copyrighted portrait of a politician. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mario De Marco.jpg
Image is obviously a copyrighted portrait of a politician. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Sant Bidla.jpg
Image is from a press clipping. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Antoine Zahra I.JPG
Image is from a press clipping. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ugo mifsud bonnici.jpg
Image is obviously a copyrighted portrait of a politician. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Censu tabone.jpg
Image is obviously a copyrighted portrait of a politician. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:André Rocha da Silva.jpg
Image is from a press clipping. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:JosephArmani.JPG
Image is from a press clipping. Author claims that the work is self-made. By looking at the metadata of all of the author's images, we can see that it is a different camera model for almost every contribution. --Edon Gojani (talk) 00:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
