Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 March 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< March 10	March 12 >

1 March 11

[edit] March 11

[edit] Image:Emoto in interview 2005.jpg

Screenshot from a copyrighted film, uploader does not hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 00:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kuzman josifovski.jpg

Source is not valid, you can't have the image file location on the wikipedia server as a source Jackaranga (talk) 03:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Logo-bkk.jpg

Screenshot from a TV series, uploader does not hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 03:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:LOGO-MALIGNO.jpg

Promotional photo for a product or service, not likely that the uploader holds copyright. Polly (Parrot) 03:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Maraclara-logo.jpg

Screenshot from a TV show, uploader doesn't hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 03:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ABSCBN-logobox.JPG

Corporate logo, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 03:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:V89708p0.jpg

Website is copyrighted, CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 04:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:IMG 3461 preview.jpg

No evidence that the CC license is correct, the source gives no information about copyright. Polly (Parrot) 04:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Joksimovicrockonnet2yqrm0.jpg

[edit] Image:Ivan Bosiljcic.jpg

[edit] Image:Elton John.jpg

Tagged {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but Flickr source page [1] says it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic. "Noncommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. There is no evidence this photo was ever licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0. —Bkell (talk) 05:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:DavidPaterson.jpg

No information given by the uploader, appears to not be a candid pic, but an official pic, and the uploader has only made 2 edits, one to upload this image, and second to add it to the article about this individual. In a WP:BLP, we should have more info about an image and its source and whether or not it (actually) is free-use. Cirt (talk) 06:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete - It's clearly a professionally produced photo. The chances are extremely high that it's copyrighted and absent the uploader providing proof that they have the right to release it under the GFDL, the chances that the uploader is not that copyright holder approach 100%, imo. -- Hux (talk) 06:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete, pretty obvious copyright violation. Nesodak (talk) 12:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jennamiscaviage.jpg

Need verification that this image is free-use. It would be better to delete this instance of this image, upload it to Wikimedia Commons, and get verification on its free-use status via OTRS. Cirt (talk) 07:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Z-9c.jpg

Obviously not a screenshot of Wikipedia! Uploader user:Jownawan seems to be upping random images from the net (see below also). FiggyBee (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:F-22p.jpg

Obviously not a screenshot of Wikipedia! Uploader user:Jownawan seems to be upping random images from the net. FiggyBee (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kendrawiseman1.jpg

Unclear status as to free-use for this image. Image should be deleted, and if it is indeed free-use, moved to Wikimedia Commons and have its free-use status confirmed w/ verification via OTRS. Cirt (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment - The site it comes from has "Copyleft 2008" on the bottom of each page. Since this is, in part, Kendra's site we can assume that she owns the rights to the pic and, under copyleft, has released it for use. --65.87.105.7 (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gallery img katol.PNG

User states he created the images on his own but clearly looks like he has copied the image from a copyright website. License is also of not fair use. Original website: http://www.katolnagarparishad.org/. --gppande «talk» 08:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dan bor parks.PNG

[edit] Image:Katol orange.png

[edit] Image:Twitchfilm.net 2.JPG

Screenshot of a web site, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 16:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv, copyright holder of this content. Eklein428 —Preceding comment was added at 16:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Trendwatch.JPG

Screenshot of a web site, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 16:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv, copyright holder of this content.--Eklein428 (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AdLand 2.JPG

Screenshot of a web site, uploader unlikely to hold copyright Polly (Parrot) 16:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv, copyright holder of this content. --Eklein428 (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ad Freak Revised.JPG

Screenshot of a web site, uploader unlikely to hold copyrigh Polly (Parrot) 16:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv, copyright holder of this content.--Eklein428 (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:3d mag 1.jpg

Magazine cover, uploader unlikely to hold copyright Polly (Parrot) 16:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv, copyright holder of this content.--Eklein428 (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Exquisite Corpse Poster 2.jpg

Image of a copyrighted poster, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 16:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv, copyright holder of this content.--Eklein428 (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Exquisitecorpseposter1.jpg

Image of a copyrighted poster, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright Polly (Parrot) 16:28, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I work on behalf of Littleminx.tv the copyright holder of this content.--Eklein428 (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cage2.jpg

Uploader claims to own copyright when this is clearly not the case Mayalld (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RI News10126.jpg

Claimed as user-created PD, but the image simply contains screenshots of news openings from television stations WJAR, WPRI-TV, and WLNE-TV, which are owned (and copyrighted) by those respective stations... WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:My_chemical_romance_teenagershq_wiki.jpg

I doubt the image uploader holds the copyright to the video. Rockfang (talk) 18:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete:Agreement with the above...--Cameron (t/c) 12:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BibiAtHefei.jpg

I don't read Chinese but the image on zhWiki link to this page and this image seems to just be a crop of the image on that page and it just says "©2008 Baidu", nothing about Creative Commons. Sherool (talk) 18:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chandrachur_singh.jpg

The copyright notice on the source website says "© Copyright, SurfIndia (A premier directory on India). All Rights Reserved.", no evidence that the uploaer have the rights to release the image under Creatice Commons. Sherool (talk) 18:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AnthonyCharlesAfro.jpg

Tagged as Creative Commons Attribution, but looking at the Flickr page it's actualy Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative, wich is a non-free license. Suppose it's possible the license on Flickr have been changed since it was uploaded but that's hard to verify at this point... Sherool (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dom_Irrera_-_Kilkenny_Cat_Lauths_-_Ireland.jpg

~~Originaly uploaded as just "With permission" and no license tag, almost a year later Shyam came by and tagged it as Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 for reasons unknown.~~ Sherool (talk) 20:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The uploader have contacted me by e-mail stating that he do wish to release it feely, and asking what an apropriate license would be. I told him the current license is fine, but that it's not obvious from the image page that he actualy agreed to release it under that licnese, so I asked him to make a small edit to the page confirming that he was ok with the CC license there, seems better than have me or some other user add a tag based only on off Wiki communication. --Sherool (talk) 12:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Widthdrawn. --Sherool (talk) 16:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hbcarter.jpg

No sign of a free license release on http://www.people.com/ Sherool (talk) 20:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Copy to Commons. David Pro (talk) 19:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete. It is a non-free image of a living person; as such, fair use cannot be claimed. The incorrect image license has been invoked on the image info page. On www.people.com, which is quoted as the source, they have a footer stating Copyright © 2008 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. The image should be deleted. aJCfreak yAk 14:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Really nice boobs.
Sad delete Although this is a much nicer picture than the former (to put it more politely than the above)..I must agree with AjcFreak. --Cameron (t/c) 11:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hamer2.jpg

The image on Flickr is licensed as Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative, not Creatice Commons Attribution as it's tagged here. Sherool (talk) 20:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ufo-conference-national-press-club07.jpg

Image has no caption, its source is a dead link and it appears to some kind of press photo. It is likely to be copyrighted by its photographer, who is not credited and improperly licensed GFDL. Dual Freq (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Update, I found the apparent source, and asserts copyright, therefore I have posted no license delete and no rationale delete tags on it. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cage3.jpg

Uploader claims to be copyright holder, which is patently not the case Mayalld (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Strong Delete, definitely not the copyright holder unless he owns the Sittingbourne Gazette. Redfarmer (talk) 16:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)