Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 June 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] June 6

[edit] Image:US Sevens Rugby Team in New Zealand.jpg

Tagged PD with a claim of permission, but Flickr page has clear 'all rights reserved' notice. No evidence to suggest uploader is the image's creator. KrakatoaKatie 01:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Under the permission section of the summary the message is a copy that explicitly states the photographers willingness to allow it to be used on the article, I dont see how that can be disputed, but if you are not happy with this I will reemail the photographer asking for a lisence chnage if you are still not satisfied. Taifarious1 03:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
In the permission section of the summary it says use in wikipedia article only - which I dont think is acceptable it has to be free use for any purpose. Need to send Wikipedia a copy of the email please refer WP:COPYREQ. MilborneOne (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
I have sent a copy of both emails asking for and the response by the author for permission to the Wikimedia Foundation about the validity of the permission granted, but if they find that wished expressed by the author does no suit Wikipedia guidelines, is it still possible to ask the author to license his photograph under a Wikipedia compatible license? Taifarious1 00:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it's best to ask the author to release the work under a compatible license. howcheng {chat} 04:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Well I haven't heard back from the WF about the legitimacy of the permission but i have a feeling i may have to ask anyway. Taifarious1 04:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jeff Hardy Tag Team Champ.jpg

iMatthew T.C. 01:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kobe_Bryant_Lakers_Celtics.jpg

Flickr source shows all rights reserved. Sole photo uploaded by user (same name as Flickr uploader, by the way). Image orphaned. Kelly hi! 03:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1950s_Tennis_at_Pinelands_Club,_Cape_Town.jpg

No indication the Filckr uploader is the photographer. Kelly hi! 03:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mudkip.gif

Look at the image, seems to be well know, and the same of origaln OsamaK 11:34, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete. So I hurd you liek copeerite violationz? ViperSnake151 17:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:38064235 bel celebrate300x300.jpg

Low resolution, no meta-data, border. Looks like it was taken from another website. J Milburn (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bapu.jpg

Author makes a paltry claim that they created the foto, but it seems doubtful, the tagging is incorrect. Esprit15d • talkcontribs 16:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Tagging has been corrected. Let me know if there is still an issue.--rohitom (talk) 17:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Painting2.jpg

No evidence uploader is the painter of this image. Kelly hi! 19:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hands.jpg

No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 19:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Innovative Learning Logo.jpg

I doubt that the logo for a for-profit corporation is public domain. J Milburn (talk) 20:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:JohnGray.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 20:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:This Cruel World Album Cover.jpg

Unless the uploader is an executive with the recording company, they could not have created the image theirself. Corvus cornixtalk 22:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Salmela Anssi 07 01 Tappara.jpg

The image looks to be professionaly posed, no explanation as to how the uploader is the copyright holder. Corvus cornixtalk 22:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Avianca Airbus A320-200 F-MM BZ 3408.jpg

Same image (different size) as [2] from [3] photo taken by Yannick Delamarre/French Frogs Aviation Pictures no proof uploader or stated author Ricardo Ariza is the same person MilborneOne (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Photosation_30_mar_2008_(4).jpg

A fan site is likely NOT the copyright holder of the image and therefore has no authority to release it under the GFDL. howcheng {chat} 23:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, for your information the copyright of the photo is held by the official fan club itself including all other photos of the singer, if you want to know. It is the singer's official group and the images have been released as GFDL. Why don't you contact them if you don't beleive me? The fanclub is the official copyright holder. And also, the websit eis NOT a fan site, it is inf act the singer's official website and all the picutes belong to the website itself.

Thank you for your cooperation. Blytonite (talk) 13:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:98 Honda Integra Type R.jpg

"Released by Honda Motor Company" but no evidence of release provided. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Photosation_30_mar_2008_.284.29.jpg>

Well, for your information the copyright of the photo is held by the official fan club itself including all other photos of the singer, if you want to know. It is the singer's official group and the images have been released as GFDL. Why don't you contact them if you don't beleive me? The fanclub is the official copyright holder. Thank you for your cooperation. Blytonite (talk) 13:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)