Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 January 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< January 4 January 6 >

Contents

[edit] January 5

[edit] Image:Joydenswood.jpg

The uploader claims to be the copyright holder and has tagged it for release into the public domain but this satellite image appears to be from Google Earth/Google Maps which has the following copyright notice:

"Photographic Imagery
The photographic imagery made available for display through Google Maps is provided under a nonexclusive, non-transferable license for use only by you. You may not use the imagery in any commercial or business environment or for any commercial or business purposes for yourself or any third parties.
You may not copy, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, translate, modify or make derivative works of the imagery, in whole or in part. You also may not rent, disclose, publish, sell, assign, lease, sublicense, market, or transfer the imagery or any part thereof or use it in any manner not expressly authorized by this agreement.
By using Google Maps, you do not receive any, and Google and/or its licensors (if any) retain all ownership rights in the imagery. The imagery is copyrighted and may not be copied, even if modified or merged with other data or software."

DavidCane (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Vedette_ss_02.jpg

Uploader blanked PD-self and marked "del" suggesting deletion. Jusjih (talk) 02:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nigeria_oct2003vst_LOS_OGD0153.jpg

Uploader first said Pd-self then said all rights reserved. Jusjih (talk) 02:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jjjjjjjjjjrrrrrrrrrr.jpg

Source? Importance? Doesn't link to anything. Moogle10000 06:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Srdjan Djekanovic.jpg

Came from a forum ... Is it really the author's image? Moogle10000 07:08, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Metallicaliveshitopenbox.jpg

contradicting licensing Rockfang (talk) 09:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Metallicaliveshitclosedbox.jpg.jpg

contradicting licensing Rockfang (talk) 09:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kimshushun.jpg

Website is in Japanese, uploader has a history of mistagging images he found as PD -- lucasbfr talk 11:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chenyaoye.jpg

Website is in Chinese or Japanese, uploader has a history of mistagging images he found as PD -- lucasbfr talk 11:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MichaelRedmond.jpg

Source Website is in Japanese, uploader has a history of mistagging images he found as PD -- lucasbfr talk 11:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sakataold.jpg

No license information on the website, uploader has a history of mistagging images he found as PD/GFDL -- lucasbfr talk 11:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MediumA.jpg

permission claimed, but no OTRS MECU≈talk 14:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:152889.jpg

This image looks to be a promotional image... It is highly unlikely that the person who uploaded it is the author of the work and has the authority to release it under the GFDL/CC-SA.... Moogle10000 19:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Islamabad from Pir Sohawa.jpg

Image is marked as "All Rights Reserved" at its source on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/talhah/383605997/ If the user uploaded the photo on Flickr, the license should there be changed to a Wikipedia-compatible Creative Commons license. Otherwise, this is a copyvio and the GFDL license is invalid 98.204.112.111 (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Prime Minister Secretariat Building.jpg

Same as above, source is: http://www.flickr.com/photos/talhah/492149477/, marked as All Rights Reserved but uploaded here as PD-Self 98.204.112.111 (talk) 19:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Crush AG-1.jpg

Image is ripped straight from the NBC American Gladiators website. It's listed as "replaceable fair use", but I highly question that it's fair use at all. Image is easily replaceable, as Carano is a well-known, non-reclusive public figure. It would not be difficult for someone to snap a picture of her and distribute it under a free license. Gromlakh (talk) 19:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Adventure tourism-karakoramhighway.jpg

Looking at the source, there's no evidence that image is in public domain 98.204.112.111 (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gaddafi.jpg

The original image at Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kbidesign/557982268/) is marked "All Rights Reserved", no evidence that image is in public domain. 98.204.112.111 (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Serena.jpg

Ownership of the image is cited, but no evidence that this image is in public domain. Versions of the image is available here, but no indication that images is copyright free. The uploader has made dubious public domain claims for Image:Gaddafi.jpg, Image:Adventure tourism-karakoramhighway.jpg, Image:Islamabad from Pir Sohawa.jpg, Image:Prime Minister Secretariat Building.jpg. 98.204.112.111 (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Commons showing through -Nv8200p talk 21:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bds_night_aerial_cropped.jpg

I'd like to know how the uploader took this image, and why the link to Photobucket which now states "Image violated our TOS". Most likely a copyvio MECU≈talk 21:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Indy500title.png

the image clearly has copyright marks on it Rockfang (talk) 22:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)