Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 February 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< February 1	February 3 >

1 February 2

[edit] February 2

[edit] Image:Winboot.gif

Uploader claims pd-self despite the explicit copyright on the image. Corvus cornix_talk 23:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PaskalHALOHAHO.jpg

Not a self-created image. Mosmof (talk) 00:21, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PaskalC4I.jpg

Same as above, cites http://navypaskal.cjb.net/ as source but licensed as PD-self Mosmof (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Police Days Parade.JPG

Same as above, marked as PD-self but cites http://www.rmp.gov.my/ as source. Mosmof (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PgkMP5.jpg

Same as above, marked as PD-self but cites http://www.rmp.gov.my/ as source. Mosmof (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Noley_Thornton_in_1994.PNG

Appears to be a copyrighted television screenshot, see http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Image:Taya.jpg. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 00:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Spencer_Haywood.jpg

no evidence on source site that image is released under gfdl. Garion96 (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Haywood_350.jpg

Likely copyvio. No evidence imae is released under gfdl Garion96 (talk) 01:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Peter Brimelow2.jpg

copyrighted photo of a living person. P4k (talk) 04:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tokatarifnihatasya.jpg

I doubt the legitimate use of this image. It was obviously copied from http://arifnihatasyalisesi.meb.k12.tr/ therefore the copyright status given as own work is questionable. MikeZ (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:A14c.png

Adding the following images by the same uploader: Image:George jones new.jpg Image:John Daly TV.jpg Image:FosterAllen2.jpg Image:Donna Traynor.jpg Image:Frank mitchel.jpg Image:Adrianlogan.jpg Image:Hugoduncan.jpg Image:Gerry Kelly.jpg Image:Kierangoss.jpg Image:Johnlinehan.JPG Image:Zoe salmon.jpg Image:Thehitwgang.jpg Image:William caulfield.jpg Image:Stephen nolan.jpg Image:Timmcgarry.jpg Image:Nthompson.jpg Image:Sarah travers.jpg Image:Julietturner.jpg Image:Olivia Nash two.jpg Image:Colin Bateman.jpg Image:Groomsport villiage small.jpg Image:Christine Bleakley.jpg Image:Pamela ballantine.jpg Image:Jenny Bristow.jpg Image:Wendy austin.jpg Image:Mike nesbitt.JPG Image:Lynda bryans.JPG Image:Patrick kielty.jpg

claim of subject's (and/or ad agency/website) authorizing this image not substantiated. I have posted an e-mail on the site for confirmation of OTRS being requested/granted. SkierRMH (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Response received & forwarded to OTRS, waiting for their actions... SkierRMH (talk) 04:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Also add Image:Nuala mckeever.jpg Image:Ruth langsford.jpg & Image:Gerry anderson.jpg, reuploaded by user. (Quentin X (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC))

Image A14c.png is different from the above as I took the photograph and the copyright belongs to me. I also asked Alan McFarland if I could post it and he said yes. Austenlennon (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)austenlennon

OTRS permission confirmed for all images EXCEPT Image:Groomsport villiage small.jpg. howcheng {chat} 22:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Logo-1-.gif

It seems to be a derivative of a copyrighted image found here NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 20:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rab.jpg

Appears to be WP:SPA using {{PD-self}} illicitly to circumvent WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 21:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Also note the watermark in the image. —Bkell (talk) 21:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bollywood .jpg

Claimed {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} (though the Flickr source page says it's licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0), but this is a photograph of a billboard which is probably under copyright by someone other than the photographer of this image. —Bkell (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The author has claimed that he has the rights to the image. Nikkul (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I doubt he holds the copyright to the billboard itself. His Flickr profile says he lives in Los Angeles, and this is a billboard in India for an Indian film. Of course, it is not entirely impossible that somehow he does hold the copyright to the billboard (maybe, by some sheer and improbable coincidence, he was the one who designed the billboard, and additionally he was not required to sign the rights over to the film company), but I doubt it. —Bkell (talk) 04:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)