Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 February 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< February 28 March 1 >

Contents

[edit] February 29

[edit] Image:Hinky Dinky.jpg

Tagged {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} (and a bogus PD tag), but Flickr source page [1] says it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic. "Noncommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia. —Bkell (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

  • As a corporate logo, I don't think it work as a pure free image anyway. Basically, it's a free image of a non-free subject, so while the image itself can be distributed freely, it needs a fair use rationale for use in article space (as a depiction of a copyrighted subject). I could be wrong, however. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 17:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm saying it's not even a free image of a non-free subject. Under Wikipedia's definition of "free" (which includes permission to use the content for commercial purposes), this is a non-free image of a non-free subject. —Bkell (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
    • You're probably right, that it could qualify under WP:NFCC if a non-free use rationale were written. —Bkell (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Callistovol.jpg

No evidence that uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 01:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:KGVI 24.04.1948.PNG

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder of this image, uploading user has been reported for image related vandalism. Roleplayer (talk) 03:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ria.PNG

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder of this image, uploading user has been reported for image related vandalism. Roleplayer (talk) 03:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Image-Mmf1974.JPG

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder of this image, uploading user has been reported for image related vandalism. Roleplayer (talk) 03:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ryt.JPG

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder of this image, uploading user has been reported for image related vandalism. Roleplayer (talk) 03:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ryt.JPG

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder of this image, uploading user has been reported for image related vandalism. Roleplayer (talk) 03:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Srt.PNG

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder of this image, uploading user has been reported for image related vandalism. Roleplayer (talk) 03:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RADMSchneider.jpg

No evidence opyright holder gave permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Camrose_Kodiaks_RBC_2001.jpg

No evidence that the copyright holder granted permission to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Candywar.jpg

No evidence copyright holder granted permission to use image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Roy S.jpg

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder to this image, uploading user has been blocked for image related vandalism Quentin X (talk) 13:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Agree; likely copyvio. Absent clarity on this concern, this image should go and a safe one be sought. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lee trundle.jpg

only image upload from a vandalism only account; I doubt this is self-taken The Evil Spartan (talk) 14:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Richard Dreyfuss.jpg

Doubtful that user is the copyright holder to this image, uploading user has been blocked for image related vandalism Quentin X (talk) 15:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Pm portrait.jpg

As the summary states the copyright holder is Paul McKenna, Some proof would be required that the uploader is Mr. McKenna or has Mr. McKenna's permission for the GNU and CC license to be acceptable. Polly (Parrot) 17:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Polly, can you please let me know how I can prove that the uploader is indeed Paul McKenna? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mckennapaul (talk • contribs) 12:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Identity and release confirmed in this OTRS ticket. howcheng {chat} 19:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CapeNight.jpg

No evidence that uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 18:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Capitanthompson.jpg

No evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 19:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Shah.JPG

Very dubious that this is a correct GNU license. Polly (Parrot) 19:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ar.jpg

Can find no evidence that the GNU license is correct. Website in the summary is a forum, no copyright info on the site. Polly (Parrot) 19:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Shah of Iran.JPG

Very dubious that this is a correct CC license, cannot find the image on the website mentioned in summary Polly (Parrot) 19:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ashraf Pahlavi.JPG

Very dubious that this is a correct GNU license. Polly (Parrot) 19:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:F0.JPG

Very dubious that this is a correct GNU license Polly (Parrot) 19:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Shah sister.JPG

Very dubious that this is a correct GNU license Polly (Parrot) 19:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Shah & Empres.JPG

Very dubious that this is a correct GNU license Polly (Parrot) 19:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Prince Mehrdad Pahlebod.JPG

Very dubious that the GNU license is correct. Polly (Parrot) 20:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Princess Shams.JPG

Very dubious that the GNU license is correct, cannot find the image on the website in the summary. Polly (Parrot) 20:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:PrincesShams.JPG

Very dubious that the GNU license is correct, cannot find the image on the website in the summary Polly (Parrot) 20:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gholam-Reza Pahlavi and Princess Manijeh.JPG

Very dubious that the GNU license is correct, cannot find the image on the website in the summary Polly (Parrot) 20:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gholam Reza Pahlavi and Princes Manijeh Pahlavi.JPG

Very dubious that the GNU license is correct, cannot find the image on the website in the summar Polly (Parrot) 20:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Caragh_aerial_-3.JPG

Satellite image with no indication of source. Nv8200p talk 20:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Brown.jpg

Looks like a promotional photogragh, no evidence the uploader holds the copyright Polly (Parrot) 20:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Movie.jpg

Cover of a DVD or video, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright Polly (Parrot) 20:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rachel ward.jpg

Image is copyrighted to Retna, no evidence the uploader is the copyright holder Polly (Parrot) 20:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:La femme nikita.jpg

DVD cover, uploader very unlikely to hold the copyright Polly (Parrot) 20:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CarlosDelgadoChalbaud.jpg

Source of the image is another Wiki. Most likely the uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 20:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Carlrtfc.jpg

No evidence thatthe copyright holder granted permission to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 20:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Carnations.jpg

There is no evidence the copyright holder granted permission to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 21:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 17:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Carnbyaitd5.jpg

The copyright holder is more likely Infogrames not the uploader as claimed. Nv8200p talk 21:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Caroline10.jpg

No evidence that copyright holder granted use of the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 21:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Casli.jpg

No evidence that copyright holder granted permission to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Castle_Ghetaldi.jpg

Watermark indicates image is from a commercial website. Nv8200p talk 22:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)