Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 February 23
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] February 23
[edit] Image:Anthony-epps-25.jpg
Appears to be an WP:SPA using {{PD-self}} illigetimately to curcumvent the WP:NFCC. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 07:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Dr Cook BB Western.JPG
The image is tagged public domain but has a comment that the copyright holder gave the uploader permission to post the image on Wikipedia. Has the copyright holder in fact released the photo into the public domain? --Una Smith (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Robertas_Javtokas.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Andrey_Vorontsevich.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Alexey_Shved.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Thomas_Van_Den_Spiegel.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Anatoly_Kashirov.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mindaugas_Lukauskis.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Kenan_Bajramović.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Chuck_Eidson.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Marcus_Goree.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:FinalFour_2008.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Rodina_Stadium.jpg
no evidence of GFDL in the source Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ishida_with_seeleschneider.png
no evidence of GFDL. Image found on google Rettetast (talk) 12:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:06MGR 45 chantier vn 19 d'ensemble 2A.jpg
I could not find any evidence of the GFDL on the site the description page says the image came from - therefore I assume it is copyrighted and therefore non-free. Andreworkney (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI.jpg
See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI 1.jpg
See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nicole Lapin exposay.jpg
See Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Please keep it. I am new to wikipedia and didn't know how to register. I don't even know what a sockpuppet is...I just forgot my password so had to keep signing up. Please see my website- www.beautifuldayphotography.com for more of my images. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exposay1 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg
All of these photos of Nicole Lapin have a statement from the photographer releasing the photo into the public domain. Its pretty clear that these are false. Three SPA's uploaded photos claiming to be Laura Grier: Bobbo1 (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg, Newmunch (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI.jpg, and Newzie (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI 1.jpg. Bobbo1 is probably a sockpuppet of Rock100 (talk · contribs). According to Rock100's logs they uploaded a photo of Nicole Lapin claiming to be Laura Grier several days before Bobbo1 and several of the other photos Bobbo1 uploaded had been previously uploaded by Rock100. A few hours after Bobbo1 uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg, a SPA Exposay1 (talk · contribs) uploaded Image:Nicole Lapin exposay.jpg claiming to be David Gabber. BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please keep it. I am new to wikipedia and didn't know how to register. I don't even know what a sockpuppet is...I just forgot my password so had to keep signing up. Please see my website- www.beautifuldayphotography.com for more of my images. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exposay1 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 29 February 2008
[edit] Image:Anthonygreen.jpg
No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
[edit] Image:WIKIHEADSHOT.jpg
No evidence that the uploader is the subject of the image (unlikely), or that the subject has given permission for this image to be used — PC78 (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
Er, ask him? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.237.76 (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:DCDouglas.jpg
No evidence that the uploader has created this image or holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
I am D.C. Douglas and I own this picture of myself. Feel free to call me 323-899-1998. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.234.27 (talk) 10:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Lee_Tergesen_in_2005.jpg
Only remaining image by uploader unproven to be a copyright violation. Appears to be another upload using an illigetimate license to circumvent WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:BerniceLiuRedPacket.jpg
No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
- What kind of evidence do you want? want me to take a picture of the full thing instead of just cutting the top? Dengero (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- With respect, it looks like this is an image taken from a website or scanned from a magazine or somewhere. If that is the case, then you are not the copyright holder. If you are the original photographer (which I doubt), or have been granted permission to use this image on Wikipedia, then please provide some evidence that this is the case. PC78 (talk) 01:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
