Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 February 14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] February 14
[edit] Image:Pizzicato1.JPG
Obvious promo photo. Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Song of norway.jpg
Page states: "ask for permission from simplon before using this picture on other sites" Samuell Lift me up or put me down 02:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Servo1.jpg
Copyright notice displayed on http://www.nealbridges.com. No statement about a Creative Commons license, or any free license, is listed on the site. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:AdaChoi.jpg
No evidence source website granted permission to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Curreny.jpg
Looks like a promotional image improperly tagged as GFDL-self Nv8200p talk 04:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Adam_fawer.jpg
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder or has rights to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Adam_stafford_yallisfantasyisland.jpg
No evidence uploader is the copyright holder or has permission to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 04:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Maria Ozawa.jpg
Uploader admits it's copied from a website in the image description. Image is part of a professional photo set (see [1] for example of image with watermark). CAUTION: image subject is pornographic actress, so watch out when searching for photos of subject. — Kelvinc (talk) 11:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Anzen Chitai - I Love You Kara Hajimeyou (CD Cover).jpg
CD cover is unlikely PD-self. — Kelvinc (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- answer: that is a self made cd cover scan kelvinc! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.221.219.205 (talk) 03:04, 18 February 2008
- That you scanned it doesn't mean you made it. Your scan is a derivative work and copyright of the cover still belongs to the record label: in fact, under US law, you don't own any copyright to release because your work lacks originality. And please desist from removing the {{puic}} notice from the Anzen Chitai article while this PUI process is still ongoing. Kelvinc (talk) 07:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Adelphi_Exterior.jpg
Image is from a copyrighted website. In the summary, it is stated - The image is not for profit and is for representational purposes only. No evidence uploader has permission to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Britannia_Manchester.jpg
Image is from a copyrighted website. In the summary, it is stated - TThe image will be used only to display the building on Wikipedia. No evidence uploader has permission to release the image under the GFDL. -Nv8200p talk 12:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Manors_stnnewc.jpg
No evidence uploader has permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Prideofthetyne.jpg
No evidence uploader has permission to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ScarboroughGrand.jpg
No evidence uploader has permission to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 12:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Estate.jpg
Source is a copyrighted website with no evidence permission was granted to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Adibah_noor.jpg
No evidence the soure has granted permission to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 13:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mona zaki.jpg
No evidence that the source has released the image to PD or it even owns the image Mosmof (talk) 14:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MoustafaAmar 2007.jpg
Appears to be promo photo, no evidence that it's self created Mosmof (talk) 15:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Shorouk-B.jpg
No evidence of GFDL license at source site, would be replaceable if fair use was claimed. Mosmof (talk) 15:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Advanced_Tech_Command_Deck_-_2nd_Edition_-_Cybernetics.jpg
From a commercially released game, so it is highly doubtful that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 16:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
As the designer of this product all copyright licence is held by myself in repect to every aspect of its design. Original copyright proofs of this image have been retained by myself.
If further verification is required then I can be contact through InsurgencyGaming.Com or by sending an email to admin@insurgencygaming.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meeslow (talk • contribs) 14:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Advanced_tech_command_deck.jpg
From a commercially released game, so it is highly doubtful that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Nv8200p talk 16:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
As the designer of this product all copyright licence is held by myself in repect to every aspect of its design. Original copyright proofs of this image have been retained by myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meeslow (talk • contribs) 14:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
If further verification is required then I can be contact through InsurgencyGaming.Com or by sending an email to admin@insurgencygaming.com.
[edit] Image:Aerial_Ladder_Platform.jpg
No evidence presented from copyright owner that per mission was granted to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 17:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- How do I get such evidence?
- See WP:COPYREQ -Nv8200p talk 20:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:P5151461-m.jpg
Originally uploaded as fair use; no evidence at [2] for GFDL Davepape (talk) 18:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:P4100200-m.jpg
Originally uploaded as fair use; no evidence at [3] for GFDL Davepape (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC) it was taken from an iphone dumbass.. of course its original!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.150.236.250 (talk) 10:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Chapelfront.jpg
no evidence at [4] for GFDL Davepape (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Onenewarkcenter.jpg
no evidence for GFDL Davepape (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:AerialSD.jpg
Summary indicates source of image is Port of San Diego but there is no evidence of permission granted to use the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 18:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Spiritofthetyne.jpg
taken from a website, no evidence of GFDL —Steven G. Johnson (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Aishwarya_Rai_at_Cannes_2006.jpg
No evidence of GFDL. Can be found in many websites like this. Gnanapiti (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ActionCat.gif
Claimed to be created by uploader and released into public domain, but appears to bear the Comedy Central logo. --UberScienceNerd Talk Contributions 20:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nile 1.jpg
Claims picture is "taken by a friend of mine", but no evidence that it is PD. Mosmof (talk) 21:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
