Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 April 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image:Babble 1.jpg

Claims to be a film still uploaded under public domain. No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 00:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Beastconvoy.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder, appears to be a promotional image. Kelly hi! 05:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Image kept. Tag changed to non-free 3D art. -Nv8200p talk 21:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BellHighBand.png

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 05:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:HeronsHead.jpg

No evidence of PD-release. Kelly hi! 12:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Polymerresin.JPG

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 12:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Trish regan.jpg

Claims to be copyright holder, but appears to be collection of television screenshots — Gr1st (talk) 12:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Que1.jpg

OR, AB, from a relative who was on the mission, likely free but bad source and uploader gone, if from the Navy, should be on their website somewhere MECUtalk 15:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:The Howard Johnson Experience - Demo2.jpg

Album cover uploaded under GFDL: no evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 16:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:The Howard Johnson Experience - Hogue Barmichaels.jpg

Album cover uploaded under GFDL; no evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 16:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Georges Ruggiu2.jpg

There's no evidence that this image is indeed released as GFDL. The source website does not give any information about the author and where they got this image from. And there's no mention of the GFDL on that website. — 88.134.141.133 (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:HMMS-1974-Mr. Boucher'sClass.jpg

Uploader claims self-made but does not assert being the photographer. This looks like a standard school photo, therefore, I doubt the claim is correct. Rodhullandemu (Talk) 19:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ceupicture.jpg

No evidence the uploader has the rights to release this image under the given licenses. Stifle (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CheriYecke.jpg

Uploader by her own stated rationale is not the subject of the image and does not own the image — Odd nature (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Portomasodevelopment.JPG

Tagged {{cc-by-2.5}}, but Flickr source page [1] says it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Generic. "Noncommercial" and "No Derivative Works" are not free enough for Wikipedia. No evidence is given that this image was ever licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5. —Bkell (talk) 22:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Calebk.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 23:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)