Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 April 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 18

[edit] Image:Vent2.jpg

disputed self made status — MickMacNee (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC).

[edit] Image:Cardiff christmas.jpg

Copy of copyrighted image [1], confirmed by metadata. Uploader claims self-made but gives no further details. — Warofdreams talk 01:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cardiff2.jpg

Disputed self made status, uploaded by sockpuppet of user who uploaded Image:Cardiff christmas.jpg. No response to three-month old request for further details. — Warofdreams talk 01:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Psnibanner.gif

Claims to be public domain, but contains copyrighted logos/symbols from www.psni.police.uk. Cavenbame parlez 03:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cambodia3.jpg

No indication of GFDL on the source website. Voidvector (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1520.jpg

No indication of GFDL on the source website. Voidvector (talk) 04:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:2 08.gif

Government published image with copyright labeled as self-made work. Voidvector (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bangabhaban2.jpg

Based on image quality and original at Flickr, appears to be a screenshot, and thus copyrighted. Mosmof (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bashundhara.jpg

No evidence at skyscraper city that the license is valid. Mosmof (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lovelytower Sylhet.jpg

Cites only an imagebucket link, no evidence of license. Mosmof (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Omid.jpg

Claims copyright owner sent email, but no evidence of the email exchange or OTRS ticket. Mosmof (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Modern Dhaka.jpg

No evidence at skyscraper city that the license is valid. Mosmof (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Falls1.jpg

Looks like a likely-copyrighted promo photo for the park, and image description seems to confirm this. Public domain tag in this case more than likely improper. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Falls2.jpg

Looks like a likely-copyrighted promo photo for the park, and image description seems to confirm this. Public domain tag in this case more than likely improper. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ahasign.gif

No evidence photo is in the public domain. Kelly hi! 06:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Yak30-2.jpg

Does not fail under the provisions of {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Kelly hi! 06:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Kept - valid fair use claim. Stifle (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Typhoonsub.jpg

Does not fall under provisions of {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Kelly hi! 06:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Salyut_7_from_Soyuz_T-13.jpg

Tagged as both {{PD-RU-exempt}} and {{PD-USGov-NASA}}, I don't believe either applies. Kelly hi! 06:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Altered. Colds7ream (talk) 11:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Y Kept - valid fair use claim. Stifle (talk) 22:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sıla.jpg

The main website (http://www.hurriyet.com.tr) clearly states that contents are copyrighted, and no evidence of CC-3.0 licensing is provided. Huntster (t@c) 07:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Daurian_hedgehog.gif

I don't believe {{PD-RU-exempt}} applies to artwork, only to text. Copyright for this image should lie with the creator, not the government agency. Kelly hi! 07:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RSDK01-4757-4-1-20070421195617-20070421195629.jpg

{{PD-RU-exempt}} does not apply. Kelly hi! 07:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Other images by same uploader with similar problems are Image:Resurs-dk-izmir-turkey.gif and Image:Resursdk1-chile.JPG. Kelly hi! 07:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 21:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Yak-30.gif

Tagged as {{PD-RU-exempt}}, but has no good source. Kelly hi! 07:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Kept - valid fair use claim. Stifle (talk) 22:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AliyevKGB.jpg

No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 08:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I think it is after 1954 (the guy is to old on this photo), support deletion Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Anna_Wolkoff.jpg

Source has no indication of date or authorship, or that it is PD in Russia. Kelly hi! 08:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I do not think the Russian copyright is relevant here, the photo was almost certainly taken by a British photographer Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Averbakh1950s.JPG

Not in the public domain in Russia. Lacks source information for a fair-use claim. The Commons source image has been nominated for deletion as unfree. Kelly hi! 08:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • According to the uploader it is 1955 photo beyond the 1954 cutout anyway. Most probably copyvio Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bagramyan1938.jpg

No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 08:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • It is 1938 according to the name of the file and certainly prior to 1943 according to the uniform. The author is unknown but almost certainly an employee of a state-owned photographic shop. 1938 or 1943 are well beyond the 1954 cut out date Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Image is on Commons - cannot be dealt with here. Stifle (talk) 23:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Batitsky.jpg

No evidence photo is in the public domain. Source has no info on date or authorship. Kelly hi! 08:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • The photo is probably of late 1960ies or 1970ies the guy was appointed Marshal in 1964 and he is in Marshal regalia. Support deletion Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Eisenstein1.jpg

Given source displays copyright notice. Kelly hi! 08:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Sergei Eisenstein died in 1948. The photo is obviously taken before this, so the cutout date of 1954 is satisfied. Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
    • 1954 is no longer necessarily a good cutoff date for Russian public domain, maybe {{PD-US-1996}}?
      • It looks like for {{PD-US-1996}} to apply, the copyright holder must have died prior to 1954 (unknown) or it must have been published anonymously prior to 1954 (also unknown, as the source website obviously took the photo from somewhere without crediting it). Since the image is orphaned and copyright can't be determined, I think we should delete it. Kelly hi! 15:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Allatarasova.jpg

No evidence of public domain status. Kelly hi! 11:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Well the photo is of 1937 made by an anonymous author, an employee of a state. 1937 is well beyond 1954 by the current PD-Russia implementation and beyond 1946 required to apply {{PD-US-1996}} Alex Bakharev (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
    • {{PD-Russia}} is obsolete as of 1 January 2008; Russian public domain is (mostly) {{PD-old-70}} now. But you're right in that this could be {{PD-US-1996}}, I'll do some checking. Kelly hi! 15:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BillStewart.jpg

It is a photo of another non free photo and thus a derivative of that photo Genisock2 (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:James_at_Medstead.jpg

No evidence of GFDL-license Rettetast (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Tom Korbee photo blue shirt.jpg

Promotional photograph, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 18:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Given the uploader's edits and username, I suspect WP:COI, so may well hold copyright. Paulbrock (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Domcow.jpg

Clearly not published before 1923. Polly (Parrot) 19:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:25th_Odessa.jpg

Source page displays "all rights reserved".[2] Kelly hi! 19:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:All jacked up poster 2 200x300.jpg

Movie poster uploaded as {{pd-self}}, no proof that uploader holds copyright on the poster. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 19:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)