Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 April 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< April 14 April 16 >

Contents

[edit] April 15

[edit] Image:Jessjackson10room.jpg

self-made license is clearly false. Copyright belongs to a Harrison Funk, which I assume is not the uploader Mosmof (talk) 00:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jessjacksonstudio.jpg

Apparently a promo shot found at artist's MySpace profile, no evidence of free license. Mosmof (talk) 00:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the direct link to the image on the artist MySpace page: http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=20525677&albumID=0&imageID=243131 (requires Myspace login, obviously) --Mosmof (talk) 04:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:!WMXXIVticket.JPG

Derivative work. Kelly hi! 01:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I took the pic... what makes you think a blurry ticket pic with the seat info X'd out would be unfree? --Endless Dan 12:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kaada-2007.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Web resolution, no metadata. Kelly hi! 01:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kaavya.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 01:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kabli221.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly hi! 01:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cabonnichthys.jpg

source website doesn't state free license and no permission stated or claimed via OTRS, please see WP:COPYREQ on how to request a license MECU≈talk 02:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Your17272007MurrayHighWestView.jpg

Considering that almost all of this user's photo uploads have turned out to be copyrighted images with false PD licenses, there needs to be more evidence that the user owns the rights to this image. Mosmof (talk) 05:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Pics was taken by the owner/user who has uploaded onto Wikipedia and has completed all the steps and feels that it has passed Wikipedia licensing Your1727 (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
*This response was previously posted in an incorrect section

[edit] Image:Your5335in2007.jpg

Considering that almost all of this user's photo uploads have turned out to be copyrighted images with false PD licenses, there needs to be more evidence that the user owns the rights to this image. Mosmof (talk) 05:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Pics was taken by the owner/user who has uploaded onto Wikipedia and has completed all the steps and feels that it has passed Wikipedia licensing Your1727 (talk) 21:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
*This response was posted in an incorrect section. --Mosmof (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:終身承諾.jpg

Inappropriate image for an encyclopedic article. Jackl 09:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Queen Club in Tongduchon South Korea.jpg

Checked source link, no hint of free license on image or sites general usage conditions. Site insists uploaders grant them unlimited license & don't violate anyone else's copyright, that's all. Simon Speed (talk) 11:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Angel_Locsin.jpg

Self-made/public domain license is obviously false, as it belongs to FHM, not the uploader — Blake Gripling (talk) 12:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Blatant copyright violation. Not truthful about ownership so release invalid. Deleted.--NrDg 12:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:B-26_Exploded_View.png

illustration from book/magazine as "watermark" indicates in the top left of the image, 1943 date may not be free but may be a work of the federal government, definately not pd-self MECU≈talk 12:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:B-26_Exploded_View.png

illustration from book/magazine as "watermark" indicates in the top left of the image, 1943 date may not be free but may be a work of the federal government, definately not pd-self MECU≈talk 12:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Badshah_Munir_Bukhari.jpg

no information other than license, border and low resolution make me think this is from the web, posed portrait as well MECU≈talk 12:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Boer_Legation_VA0949.jpg

no source explicitly stated, but permission claimed for "academic reseach and publication" but then 3 PD tags are used, but a 1900 date may make this free but it's from South Africa or Netherlands. MECU≈talk 13:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

  • For some reason source description did not copy. I restored this. Image is solidly in the '70 years or less' public domain of the three PD-tags used (they complement each other!). The image was produced in 1900 in the Netherlands. Note on reusage was misconstrued or phrased inaccurately: keeper of the image (Provincial Archives of the Free State, South Africa) just appreciates full recognition of custodianship in re-usage and notification through address given. Hope this suffices; please remove tag. Michel Doortmont (talk) 20:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Kept - PD old. Stifle (talk) 11:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Contreas.jpg

low resolution and no metadata, other uploads are similar, likely taken from web MECU≈talk 13:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cosmos_tubulaire.jpg

"This picture was a courtesy of Ginette. I hoped to convinced to join Wikipedia in 2002. She did not, but offered full use of her pictures." what does full use mean? Does it mean "release under the GDFL"? MECU≈talk 13:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

  • I changed the tag to that Copyrighted Free Use one, it's not GFDL, but it's still free enough for Wikipedia and is correct in parallel to her claim. ViperSnake151 14:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Echinops.jpg

no statement released under GFDL, "full use" is not acceptable MECU≈talk 14:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Did you consider asking Anthere? I'm sure she is familiar with GFDL requirements. Either the image is compliant or she would agree to its deletion. Not sure why a discussion here is needed... WjBscribe 19:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
    This is a commons image so nothing to discuss here. Stifle (talk) 11:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Elizabeth_berkley.jpg

The image can be seen on Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/photos/11917553@N00/758522058/ with the setting of "All rights reserved." Rockfang (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Not to mention that the Flickr user has put up mostly, if not all, copyvio images. --Mosmof (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Elliot_Minor_Live_at_Nottingham.jpg

"free to use on Wikipedia" means CC-BY-SA-3.0? MECU≈talk 15:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Logo gaybucuresti.ro.jpg

This is a logo for a Romanian gay film company or distributor or something, uploaded by a SPA trying to get an article on the firm. The original can be found at gaybucuresti.ro/img/logo_gaybucuresti.ro.jpg , which is also on the blacklist. KrakatoaKatie 15:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bill Taft in 2002.jpg

looks like a photo of a photo Genisock2 (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

It is a photo of a photo but author says they took both photos here.

[edit] Image:Jameslim.jpg

Unsubstantiated claim that the author has released the letter into the public domain. Mayalld (talk) 17:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jodiesmaller.JPG

under author it states "Kitten Rodwell, purchased by Meaghan Edwards (iiartisanii)" but it's unclear if the uploader purchased the dog or the image, and what terms the image purchase include MECU≈talk 18:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:JorhelJ.jpg

permission claimed but no OTRS, please see WP:COPYREQ for what and how to ask and what to do with permission emails MECU≈talk 18:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Madeline_Schiller.jpg

from uploader's "personal file", what does that mean? do they own the image? MECU≈talk 18:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I own the picture. There are no copyright restrictions on this picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyton (talk • contribs) 20:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Group-brown.jpg

Promotional photograph of a band uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 19:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment: The uploader was the singer of the band (The Misunderstood) and noted "My pic - FREE - to public domain" in the commentary with the picture. AllyD (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • This photo is from the cover of my book: "Like, Misunderstood" ISBN0-9778166-1-3 to which I own copyright. And it is FREE TO PUBLIC DOMAIN. Sd. Rick Brown--Rickbrown9 (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Muscaris-2.JPG

"full use" means release under GFDL? MECU≈talk 19:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Did you consider asking Anthere? I'm sure she is familiar with GFDL requirements... WjBscribe 19:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Peregrine.JPG

No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 20:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete – A properly sourced higher quality version of this image is available on the commons (Image:Falco peregrinus naumann.jpg) and this is an orphan. BlueAzure (talk) 03:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Brookgreen pledge 9741.JPG

Sculpture by living artist. Works in US PD if published before 1989 without copyright notice or before 1923. No Freedom of panorama in the US. No permission. Simon Speed (talk) 21:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Leaena and lioness.jpg

No date given for sculpture. Works in US PD if published before 1989 without copyright notice or before 1923. No Freedom of panorama in the US. No permission. Simon Speed (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Terryscott.jpg

Uploader unlikely to hold the copyright of this promotional photograph. Polly (Parrot) 21:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cabin1.jpg

No evidence of PD status at given source. Kelly hi! 23:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cadoneghe-Stemma.gif

Permission claimed, but no OTRS link. Kelly hi! 23:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)