Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 September 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< August 31 September 2 >

[edit] September 1

[edit] Another image

I have much work to do this "image" of Chloe and it dosn't violates any copyright. I really used a video image like a "model" to do my work and, apparently, you can think this is a copy then I replaced by another image. Maybe this new image are acceptable.--Mitthus 23:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

The user KameraObscura posted this about my image: "I think the user is just being perverse. Now he's added a crude line drawing that looks nothing like Chloe Agnew. Isn't there some rule that an image of the performer in the entry needs to at least have some measure of quality?" Is it a joke? I am a great fan of Chloë and I think wikipedia is free. I will prepare another image with more quality to satisfy any art critic.--Mitthus 23:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chloeagnewpicture.jpg

Original uploader claimed on my talk page that this image was created entirely by him on paper and then scanned into the computer. Having no direct proof otherwise, I AGF and let it stand. Another editor found the original here, and removed the image from the article, Chloë Agnew. -- Huntster T • @ • C 19:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)