Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 October 20
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] October 20
[edit] Image:Lama v4 apmc.JPG
This was almost surely not released in the public domain by Esky itself nor is it anyone's "entirely own work", as the image is just an edit of an advertisement image. This is surely not the appropriate licence — EpiVictor 00:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Image:Sept11speech.jpg
author is the subject, cannot also be the photographer. photo looks official from text at bottom Secretlondon 05:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Coatofarmsnew.gif
Not a USGov image as specified by license — Dppowell 06:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Minstrels.jpg
No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Looks like an advertising shot. Chris B • talk 13:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hp098765.jpg
publicity photo (altered) claimed as own work & copyright holder — SkierRMH 19:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hd5678.jpg
publicity photo (altered) claimed as own work & copyright holder — SkierRMH 19:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hilaryduff1590.jpg
publicity photo (altered) claimed as own work & copyright holder — SkierRMH 19:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Hilaryduff1256.jpg
publicity photo (altered) claimed as own work & copyright holder — SkierRMH 19:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ElviraPopescu.jpg
No evidence this is in public domain. Garion96 (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC) The subject was born in 1894, and clearly the picture dates from when she was about 30 -- I estimate from 1923-1924. So in all likelihood whatever copyright there was on the image has by now expired. Turgidson 09:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:EdwinCatmull.jpg
No evidence image was released under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
