Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 October 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] October 10

[edit] Image:Clachnaharry.jpg

Summary says "My own property" and tagged as uploader/copyright hlder, but appears to be a professionally printed map  But|seriously|folks  07:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:BealachMap.jpg

Summary says "My own property" and tagged as uploader/copyright holder, but appears to be professionally printed map.  But|seriously|folks  07:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Clanmaclaren.jpg

There is an underlying copyright in the placque and its elements.  But|seriously|folks  09:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thum_Fel's_uploads

Image:Skyline02-1-.jpg Image:MiamiFireworks.jpg Image:Miami-Four-Seasons-hotel.jpg Image:Dscn0062-nice-port-castle-hill .jpg Image:Nice-port-castle-hill.jpg Image:800px-Nice panorama2-1-.jpg Image:St Jean Cap Ferrat.jpg] Image:L26.jpg Image:L4.jpg Image:Nice.jpg Image:Miami-1-.jpg Image:MiamiSkyline.jpg Image:Miami1.jpg Image:Miamipic.jpg Image:Miamipic-1-.jpg Image:L3-1-.jpg

Appear to be random web-pics. user has not responded to requests for more info and has has simular images deleted for being clear copyvios Image:Cap Ferrat.jpg. Also claims to have been in a position to take photos in both Miami and Nice on 07/10/2007.Genisock2 13:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kristin Davis black dress.jpg

Bottom right of image clearly states that it belongs to Getty Images. Therefore, it's copyrighted and not being used for critical commentary. Dismas|(talk) 14:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Update: The user has now uploaded the exact same image sans the "copyright Getty Images" bit in the corner. Dismas|(talk) 15:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Simirose.jpg

no evidence of PD status Calliopejen1 14:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Laura Harris 2007.jpg

The user that uploaded this image uploaded the exact same image only this time they said that it was a screenshot. See here. So which is it? Do they own it and therefore can release it under PD or is it a screenshot? I say screenshot. Dismas|(talk) 15:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes it is a screenshot.

[edit] Image:Carmen Rasmussen sings anthem.jpg

The user previously uploaded this exact same image under a fair use screenshot license. Now they are claiming that it's in the public domain and that they are releasing it. Dismas|(talk) 15:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

This is an image I have made adjustments to myself. It is a low resolution and is being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject.

[edit] Image:Cynthia-nixon red hair crop.jpg

The user previously uploaded this exact same image under a fair use screenshot license. Now they are claiming that it's in the public domain and that they are releasing it. Dismas|(talk) 15:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

This is an image I have made adjustments to myself. It is a low resolution and is being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject.

[edit] Image:Kam Heskin red top 05.JPG

The user previously uploaded this exact same image under a fair use screenshot license. Now they are claiming that it's in the public domain and that they are releasing it. Dismas|(talk) 15:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

This is an image I have made adjustments to myself. It is a low resolution and is being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject.

[edit] Image:Sarah Wynter long hair 06.jpg

The user previously uploaded this exact same image under a fair use screenshot license. Now they are claiming that it's in the public domain and that they are releasing it. Dismas|(talk) 15:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

This is an image I have made adjustments to myself. It is a low resolution and is being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject.

[edit] Image:Michealowenwristband.jpg

No evidence that uploader was holder of the copyright or has permission to release into the public domain. Obvious publicity photo. — DWaterson 16:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sean Ghazi.jpg

This image comes from a press kit and there is no evidence that the copyright holder has released it into the public domain. B 21:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SitiNurhaliza.jpg

This looks like a news media photo. Googling finds it a number of places - http://www.topix.com/who/siti-nurhaliza for example. B 21:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)