Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 November 25
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] November 25
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan01.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan02.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan03.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan04.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan05.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan06.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan07.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan08.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan09.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan10.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:MichaelMadanaKamaRajan11.jpg
Screenshot of film with self license. CoJaBo (talk) 02:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Fighter.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Elementalist.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Chanter.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Fighter.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ranger.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Wizard Class.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Priest.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Aion Knight.JPG
Obviously concept art of character from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Visuals.JPG
Obviously concept art or screenshot from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Flying.JPG
Obviously concept art or screenshot from copyrighted video game, not GFDL. User has uploaded multiple similar images, of which possibly FU cannot be justified for simultaneous use of all. — Kelvinc (talk) 02:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ChesterCrest SteveHowet.gif
Image description seems to allege "with permission only" license instead of a free license WinHunter (talk) 11:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Are we even sure that the website owner from whom the image was taken was allowed to use this image and, hence, allowed to grant permission for it to be used on wikipedia? DDStretch (talk) 12:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Can we apply the same rationale used by < User:Marnanel when s/he wrote about the CheshireItalic text Crest or Coat of Arms - " I consider this fair use in the same way that reproducing a corporate logo is fair use"? "This was a project to add the arms of the towns, boroughs, cities, districts and counties of England and Wales to both the English Wikipedia and the Welsh Wicipedia (see the "other languages" link) where appropriate. All the images came from the excellent civicheraldry.co.uk [1]. I've contacted the webmaster of the site and he's happy for the pictures to be used as long as we give credit. He mentions that towns may occasionally object to the use of their civic arms on a website. (However, I consider this fair use in the same way that reproducing a corporate logo is fair use.)" I also have contacted the webmaster of civicheraldry.co.uk to ask him to add the Chester COA to his site. When he does we can then use the COA in the same manner that the CHESHIRE COA has already been used. Doesn't civicheraldry.co.uk have the same problems with copyright? Who does own the copyright to a city's COA - The city or the citizens represented by the city? and I think the 'a corporate logo is fair use' point is strongest argument to be able to use COATony - Twinney12 (talk) 21:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: It is unlikely one would be persued for (mis)using this image, but the uploader needs to clarify the licencing. This image pertains to a council, not a territory and is not an emblem for a people like a flag. -- Jza84 · (talk) 01:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Arrivavoyagernew.png
Listed with {{PD-self}}, but appears to have been blatantly screen-grabbed from this online magazine (the front page thereof). I have asked the uploader to comment, but have had no response yet. — RFBailey (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:B-h.jpg
The photograph is a derivative work of the Benson & Hedges logo and trademark. — Chris.B | talk 20:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:An_Omega_Particle.png
Apparentyly sourced from site that ihas been demmed 'llegal'. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
