Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 November 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< November 16	November 18 >

[edit] November 17

[edit] Image:Moonkindruid2.jpg

Screenshot in copyrighted game of copyrighted game content. <eleland/talkedits> 02:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I changed the tag to {{Non-free game screenshot}}. It's used in Owlbear. Rocket000 (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Billa-04.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:14549301_billa37.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:14551612_billa50.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1472960283_l.jpg

No evidence uploader is copyright holder, appears to be a scan of album jacket or promo photo. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:14738087.JPG

I don't think the uploader owns the copyright to this book cover. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment: it appears the uploader is quite possibly the author, given the username. In my experience in page patrolling, photos that look like that placed on the page are usually present when the uploader is the subject. The Evil Spartan (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:18_thumb.jpg

Uploader apparently not copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1803293076118l.jpg

Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Fbgnn.jpg

Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:URCC Cary 1.JPG

Looks to be a professional image. No claim by the uploader to be a professional photographer. Claim of pd-self doesn't seem valid. Corvus cornix (talk) 04:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cary.jpg

Looks to be a professional photo, no indication that the uploader is a professional photographer. Corvus cornix (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:URCC Cary 2.JPG

Appears to be a professional image. No claim by the uploader to be a professional photographer. Corvus cornix (talk) 04:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sledeflogo.jpg

Professional logo, no indicatoin that the uploader owns the logo Corvus cornix (talk) 04:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:2002629819-1-.jpg

Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 04:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

License changed to nonfree and kept. The Evil Spartan (talk) 01:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

fair use reviewed. SkierRMH (talk) 07:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ardeth.jpg

No evidence of public domain status at given source. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 05:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rooftop.jpg

Copied from this site, which has no indications that the image is a work of the U.S. government. Esrever (talk) 08:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AJ.Perez.jpg

Uploader is probably not copyrightholder Rette tast 17:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Empress_Schuck.jpg

[edit] Image:John-and-Eliza.jpg

Uploader probably not copyrightholder Rette tast 17:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Joann_Perez.jpg

Uploader probably not copyrightholder. Rette tast 17:46, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gorch Fock 2.jpg

Unclear whether this image is in the public domain or whether it is fair use. If it is fair use, it fails WP:NFCC#1 (replaceability), because the ship still exists today. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I think that this image is under copyright because the website that it purports to come from has "© 2007 Breucom Medien" on its main page. Photographs are sold from the website, so I think we need to be careful with any fair use images from it. The image can be replaced with this excellent image of the same ship from Commons. Bláthnaid 23:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

- That's right. I think it should be replaced by your suggested image! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.138.74.43 (talk) 09:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Now shows Commons:Image:Gorch Fock 2.jpg. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:WORLD-METRO-MAP-2005.png

Image has copyright listed in bottom left corner and no information about being freely release is listed –Dream out loud (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The uploader should be contacted, as he/she said "concept by me...redrawn by..." and this seems to contradict the TFL copyright symbol on the map itself. If determined this is not free pic, I think it qualifies as "fair use" in an article about the Tube mao, showing how its design guidelines were applied on a worldwide scale. Odedee (talk) 04:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Added non-free tag since uploader hasn't confirmed. Not deleted. Shell ^babelfish 02:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Blogoat.jpg

No evidence of GFDL Rette tast 21:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Zimbabwe_100,000_dollar_note.jpg

Resolved.

derivative? Rette tast 22:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Probably doesn't even qualify as a derivative work, as it's a faithful reproduction. That said, it is acceptable as fair-use in Paper money of the Zimbabwean dollar, where I have moved it, and corrected the license tag. <eleland/talkedits> 22:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Hummer H2 Geiger - 1024x768.jpg

Unsure of the licensing status of the image, can be found at http://www.esnips.com/doc/a6e65a35-b7d4-496e-802c-23ffb1bc6831/Hummer_H2_Geiger (amongst others found in a Google search for 'Hummer_H2_Geiger'). Certainly doubt that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed.

In addition, its not used anywhere on en, uploaders other edits are all vandalism, and the summary is just personal information and formatting tests. Blair - Speak to me 23:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC)