Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 20
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] July 20
[edit] Image:Clemens.JPG
This user has uploaded many copyrighted MLB images claiming he/she created them. It also looks like a pro-taken image. --Mschel 00:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:TonyPena.JPG
This user has uploaded many copyrighted MLB images claiming he/she created them. It also looks like a pro-taken image. --Mschel 00:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:LarryBowa.JPG
This user has uploaded many copyrighted MLB images claiming he/she created them. It also looks like a pro-taken image. --Mschel 00:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Andyphillips.JPG
This user has uploaded many copyrighted MLB images claiming he/she created them. It also looks like a pro-taken image. --Mschel 00:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Igawa.JPG
This user has uploaded many copyrighted MLB images claiming he/she created them. It also looks like a pro-taken image. --Mschel 00:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:TroyWilliams(2007).jpg
Declined speedy. Uploader asserts PD but provides no evidence thereof. But|seriously|folks 05:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Shrike-Hyperion.jpg
Source site says the images are "free for personal use" and "for commercial use please contact me" so they are unfree. // Liftarn 10:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not comercial use it falls under fair useShrike 10:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- The downstream users of Wikipedia data may be commercial. Fair use and pubic domain is not the same thing. If you want to argue fair use please use a suitable tag from Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free instead. // Liftarn
- In its current usage - on a user page not an article - it is ineligible for fair use. Madmedea 20:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- The downstream users of Wikipedia data may be commercial. Fair use and pubic domain is not the same thing. If you want to argue fair use please use a suitable tag from Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free instead. // Liftarn
[edit] Image:MWSS-full-logo.png
Non Commerical only - Sfan00 IMG 13:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Should be ok under fair use claim regardless. Calliopejen1 06:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Dana_066.jpg
No evidence for GFDL release, permission stated may only be in respect of Wikipedia- No OTRS ticket evidence Sfan00 IMG 15:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jeddah_Landscape.jpg
The website http://www.alshatee.com/index1.htm does not seem to indicate that images are released under a free licence ElinorD (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Griff1.jpg
Newspaper scan... Sfan00 IMG 15:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cpt1.jpeg
Google Earth extract Sfan00 IMG 16:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Victoratiyeh.jpg
Labeled as {{PD-USGov}} but comes from state of Oregon. I can't find anything on the source site to indicate these are in the public domain. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Thesnare.jpg
The uploader have uploaded a number of album covers and such under various free "self created" licenses, so basicaly I'm a bit scheptical about him actualy taking this photo himself. Sherool (talk) 17:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Elements35.jpg
No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 19:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Elementsexample.jpg
No evidence that uploader is creator or copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 19:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Karimsaidi.jpg
No evidence of public domain status. Videmus Omnia Talk 19:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mantaolimpia02.jpg
watermarked image - fotos.miarroba.com states "Todos los derechos reservados" which doesn't look like "public domain" BigrTex 21:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I believe "Todos lo derechos reservados" means "All rights reserved." Correct me if I'm wrong, as my Spanish is a little fuzzy. Steve J 15:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)