Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< July 16 July 18 >

Contents

[edit] July 17

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

CCASA 2.5 SkierRMH (talk) 07:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Etching_at_Breakwater_Prison.jpg

OR, AU, Probably CV Nv8200p talk 01:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Clearly says 1909 in that pic. -N 23:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Then it might be PD but not GFDL or CC. It is still an orphan and should be deleted. -Nv8200p talk 22:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
      • I think the photograph of this graffiti is modern, and released under the GFDL (as someone could claim this is a photo of a 3-D etching and Bridgeman doesn't apply.) The original graffiti is PD. I don't think there's any indication it's an unfree image, so I'm delisting it from here, but feel free to nominate it at WP:IFD as an unneeded orphan if you like. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] Image:Brentwood_College_New_School_1961.jpg

No evidence uploader has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

contact Lara McDonald at lara.mcdonald@brentwood.bc.ca if have any questions

[edit] Image:Brentwood_College_Old_School_1923.jpg

No evidence uploader has the authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 01:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

contact Lara McDonald at lara.mcdonald@brentwood.bc.ca if have any questions

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Commons image SkierRMH (talk) 07:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RAWA_monogram.jpg

no evidence for public domain copyright status Bleh999 01:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I dont think fair use requires a public domain copyright status. Why did you nominate this image? --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 03:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I don't think you noticed that it is using a PD template not used as fair use and no rationale Bleh999 04:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
So this can be fixed if we put in a fair use template? --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 04:31, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I think fair use for a logo would certainly be a possibility - add the correct tag and a rationale. I would also consider uploading a lower resolution image as there is no need for it to be this big - and for fair use the lower usable resolution the better. Madmedea 09:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
I made a 75% reduction and reuploaded it: Image:RAWA monogram.jpg. Any lower res. and the text inside the logo will be illegible. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 17:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] Image:Faith2a.jpg

Was tagged for speedy, now tagged as GFDL, but sure looks like a copyvio image.  But|seriously|folks  06:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Ballast_Delivery_Train.jpg

Source states the image is copyright Capita Symonds and is a publicity photo, unlikely the corporation has released the image under the GFDL. No evidence of permission found at WP:OTRS. Shell babelfish 08:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kali_logo-1-.jpg

No indication of this being a free image. Could be fair use, but no such tag is used, and neither is there any rationale for that. Algotr 16:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Xpla.jpg

The image summary says "Image courtesy of X-Play co-host Morgan Webb" but gives no indication that the co-host actually released it under public domain. ++aviper2k7++ 20:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Someone should do some more research on this before a decison is reached. Jedibob5 17:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)