Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 July 15
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] July 15
[edit] Image:GayAsianMen.jpg
No source has been listed; image does not seem to belong anywhere, and the user that uploaded it linked to it on the page for Hedley, an article that is completely unrelated to it. DearPrudence 02:02, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Image appears to have been uploaded for vandalistic purpose only. Speedily deleted.--Alf melmac 21:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Euromalays.jpg
Obviously a derivative work, original sources unattributed. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Eurasians.JPG
Obviously a derivative work, original sources not specified. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Michael Fedele.jpg
State of ColoradoConnecticut photo, not Federal.—Chowbok ☠ 03:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think you mean State of Connecticut. Regardless it is indeed copyrighted material that has been posted and deleted before.—Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Steve Pence.jpg
State of Kentucky photo, presumably. Not federal.—Chowbok ☠ 03:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:OfficialheadshotAnthonyBrown.jpg
Dubious public domain claim.—Chowbok ☠ 03:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I love the fact that the image file name actually includes "official head shot". Found the original on the state site [1]. It's elsewhere as well so it is probably in his press pack photo. Still replaceable though so wouldn't qualify as fair use.Madmedea 14:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:JohnDCherryPortrait.jpg
No evidence given that this is public domain.—Chowbok ☠ 03:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:GOD11.JPG
Statute may be old, but art does not appear to be old and needs to be confirmed as PD. But|seriously|folks 04:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Geoshradcbe030.jpg
Uploader MIGHT be photographer with website http://www.peermade.info/geoshrad/phot.htm, but this has to be confirmed. But|seriously|folks 04:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Jack-dalrymple-56.jpg
State of North Dakota image, not PD.—Chowbok ☠ 04:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Gonopharr_Crest.png
Tagged as GFDL but uploader has serious copyright problems. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive239#User:ParthianShot. But|seriously|folks 04:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:DDaugaard.jpg
"This is a product of the State of South Dakota, and is therefore in the public domain", says the summary. Uh, no.—Chowbok ☠ 04:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Lawton barbara official.jpg
Resolved.Presumably a State of Wisconsin photo.—Chowbok ☠ 04:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
"The official images posted are public domain for your use and distribution." from the Official website: http://ltgov.wisconsin.gov/mediaroom.asp?locid=126&linkid=1068
[edit] Image:Brahmi Script.gif
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [2] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [3]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 09:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I believe this may qualify as {{PD-ineligible}}. howcheng {chat} 22:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Asokan Brahmi inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [4] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [5]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Satavahana cave inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [6] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [7]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ikshvaku inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [8] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [9]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Salankayana Nandivarma inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [10] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [11]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Vishnukundina inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [12] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [13]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Pallava Narasimha Varma I inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [14] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [15]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Chalukya Bhima II inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [16] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [17]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Chalukya Rajaraja Narendra inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [18] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [19]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Kakatiya Ganapati Deva inscription.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [20] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [21]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Inscription at time Errana.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [22] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [23]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Inscription at time Srinatha.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [24] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [25]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Christian writings in Telugu (1747).jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [26] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [27]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Inscription at time of Krishnadeva Raya.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [28] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [29]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Printed Telugu from the 1817 grammar by William Brown.jpg
The licensing is improper, the actual page(s) from which the image has been copied is : [30] and subsequent pages. The website does not declare GNU Free Documentation License or Public-domain licensing on the images. The website domain/root explicitly declares copyright though : [31]. In the absence of the declaration of licensing information, it is always prudent to assume that the media/text is copyrighted. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 10:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment for this and all the above similar nominations these are reproductions of several centuries old texts, so PD-art should apply. The images appear to have been orphaned so I can't determine their encyclopedic value though. -Nard 17:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Largelogo.png
GFDL claim - Sorce site says -"© 2007 purplemonkeygames.com" - No evidence of an OTRS ticket/release ShakespeareFan00 13:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nsync_photo.jpg
PD Claim- but no evidence/source of this given ShakespeareFan00 13:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ال چیم
Douglasmtaylor 13:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bordeux-airport-today.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Boris_ms3.jpg
No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Boriscure.jpg
No evidence that the uploader has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 15:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Boxcar2.jpg
No evidence user has authority to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 22:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bpn.jpg
No evidence that uploader has the right to release the image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bradycaptain.JPG
Resolved.No evidence that uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- It used to be on Derek Ward's photo website available for anyone to view, along with all photos allowed to be released under the GFDL. It was clearly stated but no archived version of the page is still accessible. The image is also available on the official Holy Cross High School website, and will be included in the index of the main page starting at the beginning of the next school year. Signed by Tommy
(Talk/Contribs) 04:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bram.jpg
Resolved.No evidence uploader has authority to release image under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 23:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
