Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 August 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] August 5
[edit] Image:Newedition_1.jpg
No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Aneesh_palamattam.jpg
source is questionable cohesion 00:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:GreteMosheimPassportPhoto.jpg
If you get a dead person's passport, do you own copyright to the photo? Videmus Omnia Talk 00:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Clearly not, but she's dead, so it probably satisfies the NFCC. Still needs a UR. Image kept. -- But|seriously|folks 03:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Greek_diplomatic_passport_1987.JPG
Derivative work, I don't think uploader owns copyright to Greek passports. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Austrian_passport_1931.JPG
Derivative work, don't think uploader owns copyright to Austrian passports either. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:UK_passport_1924.JPG
Or UK passports. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- See also [1] re UK passports Sfan00 IMG 15:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept - retagged {{PD-BritishGov}}. It was created more than 50 years ago, and appears to now be in the public domain. Nonadmin closure. The Evil Spartan 04:26, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:USA_passport_1976.JPG
Or American passports. Probably public domain, not CC. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept - retagged {{PD-USGov}} The Evil Spartan 04:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Swiss_passport_1956.JPG
Swiss passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- 70 years, still under copyright, nonfree only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 06:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Danish_passport_1952.JPG
Danish passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:1952_Belgian_passport.JPG
Belgian passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:1951_Convention_Travel_Document.JPG
U.N. travel document... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Good law school exam question. Presuming under copyright and non-free use only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:00, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Spain_passport_1963.JPG
Spanish passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- 70 years, under copyright, non-free use only. Kept. -- But|seriously|folks 07:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Norway_passport_1923.JPG
Norwegian passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:New_Zealand_passport_1949.JPG
Kiwi passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Thailand_passport_1960.JPG
Thai passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Philippines_passport_1969.JPG
Pilipino pasaporte... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Malaysia_passport_1968.JPG
Malaysian passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Japan_passport_1968.JPG
Japanese passport... Videmus Omnia Talk 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Rico_J_Puno_The_Way_We_Were.jpg
this image is from flickr, it doesn't appear to have been posted by the image creator however cohesion 02:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hmmm. You have a point. So, how should this image be handled/tagged despite of its source and permission from so-called photographer? - Dragonbite 02:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Flickr and the photographer is the only source I know. - Dragonbite 02:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Right, but this isn't the actual source of the image, just the source of a derivative. We need the actual source, and license, from the entity that created the image. - cohesion 03:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Fair use at best. -- But|seriously|folks 00:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fair use tags used; updated details on image page. Thanks. - Dragonbite 02:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Information on original image creators/copyright holders provided by flickr photographer and now posted on image talk page. - Dragonbite 00:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm removing the PUI tag, it's tagged a non-free now, with rationale etc. - cohesion 01:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Information on original image creators/copyright holders provided by flickr photographer and now posted on image talk page. - Dragonbite 00:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fair use tags used; updated details on image page. Thanks. - Dragonbite 02:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. Fair use at best. -- But|seriously|folks 00:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ikarbus-desktop-01.jpg
Taken from the company website here. Uploader claims PD-self, but this is not supported on the website. — Rlandmann 02:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Image:Unipetrol.gif
Company logo that Uploader claims PD_self for. — Rlandmann 03:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Images uploaded by User:Mario1987
Apart from the two above, User:Mario1987 has been very busy over the last two days uploading images from various corporate websites all under a PD-self tag. These include:
Image:200347.jpg Image:Nedenumit.jpg Image:Golanski-Pawel.jpg Image:Camus.jpg Image:25866 ionut rada.jpg Image:Herea.jpg Image:Kostolac-b.jpg Image:Bucuresti-sud.jpg Image:Romgaz.gif Image:Fdfee transilvaniasud poza1.jpg Image:Fd t sud fig3 en.gif Image:Emd.gif Image:ETN.gif Image:Cuprom.jpg Image:Sigla3d.gif Image:F11a.jpg Image:Sigla.jpg Image:Logo grup feroviar roman.jpg Image:Top logo.gif Image:ButanGas.jpg Image:HVB Tiriac Bank.gif Image:Petromservice.jpg Image:Supplier1.jpg Image:Interagro.jpg Image:Rompetrol 2in.gif Image:Antena1 ro.jpg Image:233 crowne.gif Image:Astra uniqa.gif Image:Unireash.png Image:Sigla-SCR.jpg Image:Rcs rds.jpg Image:Romanbrasov.jpg Image:0 homed.gif Image:Altex.jpg Image:Img romstal1.jpg Image:Elvila.jpg Image:Rtc3.jpg Image:Mobexpert.jpg Image:Iulius mall.png Image:180px-Cotidianul.gif Image:Fildas.jpg Image:Romsis.jpg Image:Cristim.jpg Image:Omnilogic.gif Image:Rafo.jpg Image:Gsp.jpg Image:RTB Bor.jpg Image:RBB.jpg Image:RBM.jpg Image:RTB TIR.jpg Image:Yugoimport.gif Image:Jugopetrol.gif Image:Belupo.gif Image:2319 Prodaja en.jpg Image:2320 Izvoz en.jpg Image:Zentiva.gif
I realise that company logos are usable under fair use provisions, but in most cases, the article itself was a copyvio and has already been speedied. In many other cases, the logo is being used to simply decorate another article not directly related to the company in question. Finally, there are a few photos in there of various sportspeople that I doubt that Mario1987 took himself. --Rlandmann 04:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note that there also was no source listed for any of his images, that powerplant photos were watermarked, and that all logos were orphaned. Calliopejen1 19:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:CRAZY copy.gif
Screenshot copyright should belong to the software creator, not the person who made the screenshot. --Richmeistertalk 14:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- what about the person who made the screen show what's shot? --Alvestrand 23:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:All_star_cashhh.jpg
PD claim - source unconfirmable... Sfan00 IMG 15:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ontario_129.png
PD Claim - Canadian Road sign design copyright is Crown Copyright surely? Sfan00 IMG 15:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- The shield design was established in 1930 (see [2]), therefore Crown Copyright would have expired based on the 50-year rule, even the somewhat modified crown designs of the "Group 4" designs from 1955 which still seems to be the basic design today. Dl2000 16:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ontario_144.png
Canadian Road sign- Crown copyright surely? Sfan00 IMG 16:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ontario_407.png
Canadian Road Sign - Crown cipyright surely? Sfan00 IMG 16:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Allow me to explain... I drew the images in Photoshop, but the shield itself is in the public domain, as it was created in March of 1930 by the Department of Highways of Ontario (now today's Ministry of Transportation. I suppose it would be a dual PD-self and PD-canada license. Perhaps i should make a license just for ontario's highway shields to simplify things like this? RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 17:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- You could explain the situation in the image summary :) Sfan00 IMG 10:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Muliple images from User:Noob999
User has uploaded multiple images falsely under a GFDL license. There three I haven't found the source for. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 17:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image:Mattmorgan.jpg
- Image:Chris-benoit-bio.jpg
- Image:Cody 1 83x64.jpg
[edit] Image:Jakoby známka.jpg
very likely not GFDL image After Midnight 0001 21:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image of a stamp, the majority of which is a copyrighted painting. Calliopejen1 20:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Sephra-chocolate-fountain-CF44.jpg and Image:Sephra-chocolate-fountain-CF18-M.jpg
Both images are from this page, which indicates "These photos are offered to Sephra clients to be used for your own marketing or other purposes free of charge." That does not appear to be equivalent to GFDL as claimed. Chick Bowen 23:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:ChamplainCollegeSeal.jpg
This is the seal to a college, which undoubtedly owns and enforces the copyright. It's been posted under a GFDL license. Esrever 23:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I've updated the liscensing to reflect that it's a Non-free Logo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surette (talk • contribs) 20:57, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:DandA_2004_Cover1.jpg
PD album cover? This may have been uploaded by the creator though, so... cohesion 23:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
