Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 August 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image:Greg Scott 2006.jpg

Uploader different to author and no claim of GFDL release. Genisock2 17:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Levan_Urushadze.jpg

no indication of gfdl at source, no explicit attribution of or statement by copyright holder ˉˉanetode╦╩ 15:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Omegaspreem.jpg

No evidence that this is a public domain photo. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:05, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Crosswise-cybertron.jpg

No evidence of GFDL. Videmus Omnia Talk 01:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Despite the addition of what appears to be a nonfree media rationale, anyone could buy this toy on amazon.com and take a picture of it. Calliopejen1 19:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kristy McNichol.jpg

Uploader admits that this image is photoshopped. Therefore a derivative work, and not something the uploader has the rights to release. Corvus cornix 02:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will contact the appropriate Wikipedia department to confirm I am the copyright holder of this artwork/illustration.

[edit] Image:Kristy McNichol Emmy.jpg

Photoshopped, derivative work, does not belong to the uploader. Corvus cornix 02:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, apparently this photo was uploaded under the wrong category. I will reupload this photo under the category of that which Julia Roberts had a similar photo uploaded of her that shows her holding an Oscar.

[edit] Image:Kristy McNichol - Little Darlings.jpg

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category and related film's page.

[edit] Image:Kristy McNichol - Only When I Laugh.jpg

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category and film page.

[edit] Image:Kristy McNichol - Empty Nest.jpg

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category and film page.

[edit] Image:Kristy and Jimmy McNichol.jpg

Uploader is not the copyright holder. Corvus cornix 02:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category.

[edit] Image:Wardawn01.jpg

Unlikely to be GFDL. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:George_fitch_2005.jpg

Unfortunately neither beeing used on his campaighn website nor giving permission to use on Wikipedia and related sites means it has actualy been released under a GFDL / CC-by-sa dual license. There needs to be an explicit permission to release under those actual licenses for those to apply, see WP:COPYREQ. Sherool (talk) 07:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Saul_Anuzis.jpg

No evidence image is released into the public domain. See link to website. Garion96 (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kashmiri tribal surrender.jpg

This image was taken by the Indian military, in Indian territory, and was first published in India. The picture has been uploaded under an incorrect lisence tag, ie. public domain in Pakistan.Zaindy87 12:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

The Pakistan argument is rather irrelevant, as it has an India tag as well. I hate to say it, but the photo will fall into public domain in India in 4.5 months, and it almost seems like we should just let it sit around til then, as it's doubtful the Indian military will suye in the meantime. The Evil Spartan 03:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
It can be undeleted in a few months then. It's not a question of whether WP will be sued. It's just not reusable free content yet. -- But|seriously|folks  03:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Kristy_McNichol_with_Franco.jpg

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I will resubmit this photo under the appropriate category.

[edit] Image:Kristy_McNichol_-_Women_of_Valor.jpg

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. Videmus Omnia Talk 18:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


This photo is really supposed to be uploaded under the Fair Use Act as its enhancements aren't enough to make it my copyright. I will go back to the photo and make sure it was uploaded und the Fair Use Act.

[edit] Image:Untitled 1982.jpg

Tagged as GFDL and non-free. Probably non-free. Also missing source. --- RockMFR 20:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Kept - someone already changed the license; marked di-no source. The Evil Spartan 03:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:DouglasKnight.jpg

Procedural listing from declined speedy. Reason was: "no proof image has been released into the public domain. just ripped off from http://www.clandouglassociety.org/. image looks like a scan from a book. user who uploaded it has a long list of copyright violations." The last sentence is absolutely correct.  But|seriously|folks  22:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)