Talk:Post-autonomous art
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles about the idea of systems. If you would like to help, you can edit this article or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within Systems. | |
|
Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
On logging in to Wikipedia, I saw a message that informs me that my article on 'post-autonomous art' (including a few additions by others) is considered 'patent nonsense'. This message does not reveal who holds that opinion, and obviously it does not provide any arguments that would substantiate it. People may well think the concept of 'post-autonomous art' is misdirected or irrelevant; however, there is enough evidence of an artistic practice calling itself 'post-autonomous' to justify an article under such heading.
I suggest this Wikipedia discussion page would be the place to express all possible opinions on the subject, including the view that we are dealing here with 'patent nonsense' - this is very much in line with the approach of post-autonomous art itself, which proposes a network of contributors with equal rights and accepts no privileged author position regarding the results produced (this holds for art as much as for theory production). Detlevhfischer 19:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
