User talk:PorkSalcho

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Pork salcho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] AfD nomination of Pork salcho

I've nominated Pork salcho, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Pork salcho satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pork salcho and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Pork salcho during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Evil1987 15:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Pork Salcho, you will be blocked from editing. Do NOT remove other people's comments on AfD discussions. Trusilver 00:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Pork salcho, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Archie Rifkowitz

A tag has been placed on Archie Rifkowitz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 05:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Editor assistance/Review Pork Salcho

Reply to "Who Decides?" from Ea/R

Just checking your Talk Page there hasn't been much interaction. Wikipedia editors rely on tags, when we should really be explaining a little more helpfully.
However, The article Pork Salcho fails the primary policy of wikipedia What Wikipedia is not...Original Research. A new invention or recipe may be groundbreaking, but it is essentially Original Research. A new recipe could oneday become a Chicken Balti or Waldorf Salad, but Wikipedia is not about guessing future trends. Wikipedia is here to reflect society provided that it is mirrored in respectable journals or books. Mike33 08:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disruptive editing

Disruptive edits like your recent edit to Wonderbra are not acceptable. Given the disputable nature of some of your other edits, it becoming difficult to assume good faith regarding your participation here. Please stop making disruptive edits, and consider making more positive contributions to Wikipedia. -- Karada 12:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ‎Nguyen University and Quagasak Maine

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Stormie 02:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Nguyen University. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Melodica. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this vandal warning tag from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Melodica was changed by PorkSalcho (c) (t) replacing content with 'NIEN EXTISTENT' on 2007-08-10T20:26:24Z. Thank you. ClueBot 20:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have first ammendment rights dammit"

Decline reason: "Er... what? We're not a government institution, and you're clearly acting disruptively. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.