Talk:Portugal. The Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Reverts to the "review"
Why are the mods reverting to the "review" when people actually try to make this a Wikipedia-like article?
[edit] bad article
This article is biase. It is basically a review of their last full length. There is very little factual information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.216.225.22 (talk) 02:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC).
What there is to this article is no worse in terms of bias than any other band's "Style" section. Someone needs to add more sections, however, comprising more factual information. This band is definitely a viable candidate for an article -- they are still together and making albums, and the band is made up of members of other previously existing bands. There is plenty of information to make an article with. Sweatersdotcom 02:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
This article uses very biased language. Additionally, where did all the information come from? The one source, http://www.azcentral.com/ent/music/articles/0724portugal0724-ON.html, only has some of the information currently in the article. Where did all the rest come from? Whoever is responsible for the current content needs to provide some sources. Furthermore, the Band Name section's first few sentences are very un-encyclopedic in nature and are altogether much too informal. This quote I particularly think is unfit for this article: "What is Portugal. The Man? Portugal is a country, not a man. Can a country consider itself a man? Are you confused yet?"Julian Maestas 00:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Touring Members = Wrong
Fixed the tour members, names were completely wrong and not even close to being right. Brandon Mitchell 23 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PLEASE ADD
Please add the LP release dates! A Must Do! I can just be the year. User:Queen-Max 22.08.2007
Ok i forgot Wikipedia is a self-made dictionary and so i jsut added the stuff myself...sry
[edit] Origin of the name?
How did they come up with this name anyway? I love it! 84.241.248.37 (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
—The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 10:58, August 22, 2007 (UTC).