Talk:Porcupine Tree

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Porcupine Tree article.

Article policies
Archives: 1
Porcupine Tree is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
February 20, 2006 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Follow this link to complete a request for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. (If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try purging this talk page.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article is part of the Porcupine Tree WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Porcupine Tree. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to Porcupine Tree-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Top This article has been rated as top-importance on the assessment scale
To-do list for Porcupine Tree:

Here are some tasks you can do:
Maintained The following user(s) are actively involved with this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
Kerrow (talk · contribs)
Beezhive (talk · contribs)
Synesthetize (talk · contribs)
This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.
Archive
Talk archives:
*Archive one

[edit] Cleanups

I've started trying to clean up the grammar and phrasing of the article. If anyone objects to my edits, please don't hesitate to revert them.

I've noticed that there is an apparent grammatical issue relating to the plural status of the band - I'm of the opinion that the band should be treated as a singular noun as opposed to plural (for example "Porcupine Tree was" as opposed to "Porcupine Tree were"). Am I incorrect in this assessment? I didn't want to change it without at least soliciting opinions, as there are quite a few places in the article that would need to be changed.   -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 04:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I must agree with your work since some parts of the article were written by me being Spanish my native language. I also agree with thinking of "band" as a singular noun, when comparing with Spanish language where we refer to "a band" in singular tense. Here we're talking about ONE band:"Porcupine Tree", not about two or more bands. It would be different if we were talking of "Steven, Colin, Richard and Gavin". And since taking other band's articles as comparison I think it's the correct way to express it. You're doing the good work, it helps a lot. Go ahead if you find more grammatical issues. Synesthetize (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

What about WP:ENGVAR? does that hold up to anything? articles like Iron Maiden and Judas Priest use British English and since PT are from England then shouldn't they use it as well? −₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪ kaiden 07:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes its supposed to be PT are, because it is a British band and we use British English. See: Blur (band), Oasis (band). indopug (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
If you're going to change this you should do it with the whole article, not only with the first sentence and then leaving the rest of the work to the others. Change it but change it in the whole article. Synesthetize (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possible source

I can't find an obvious spot for this, so I'll put it here and let those more in tune with the article's structure pick it up :) From 25-27 April, Porcupine Tree toured Australia for the first time. Just before this tour, Wilson gave an interview to the The Courier-Mail newspaper in Brisbane, which can be found here: [1] The print cite is as follows: Nahrung, Jason. "Prickly about techno age", The Courier-Mail, April 24, 2008, p. 55.  In it he discusses in part how the internet has changed music marketing. Orderinchaos 14:56, 3 May 2008 (UTC)