Talk:POM Wonderful

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Business and economics Portal
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Start rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
Low rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale
Food Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
United States Portal
This article is within the scope of the United States WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Acres

Is it 6,000 or 12,000 acres? The Boston Globe gives 12,000 but other sources list 6,000. Badagnani 09:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

It's 14,000. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.130.167.62 (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Is it correct to say that most of the acres are near the city of San Jose, California? That's what I think was stated on the Food Channel segment. I'm not sure how close San Jose is to the San Joaquin Valley. Badagnani 23:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Still need an answer on this one. Badagnani (talk) 01:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikify

In addition to correctly formatting the inline references, the introduction should be organized per WP:LEAD. --Ronz 20:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I never liked footnotes in WP articles and prefer the links as we have them; it's one fewer click to get to the source. Badagnani 20:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, there are definitely some minuses to having the references formatted. I'll get around to formatting them eventually if no one does before I get a chance. Without the references being properly formatted, it's impossible to tell references from inline external links (which should be moved to the External links section) or from linkspam (which should be removed immediately). Further, it's extremely hard to tell if the article is properly sourced, let alone written in a neutral and balanced way. --Ronz 22:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
We've worked hard on this one. Badagnani 22:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Strange erhu

Any idea why this erhu has a white face rather than snakeskin? Badagnani (talk) 01:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)