User talk:Polonium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Archives

Post any new comments below.

[edit] What wikipedia is not

Hi. I saw you prodded What wikipedia is not, which is a redirect to wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Note that {{prod}} is only for articles; redirects should be listed at WP:RfD. Also, please don't cite WP:CNR as an argument to delete a cross-namespace redirect because WP:CNR isn't accepted yet. Thanks. --Zoz (t) 16:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I've changed the tag on What wikipedia is not and WikiProject Elements from {{prod}} to {{rfd}}. If you'd like to nominate them, you can do so at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Thank you. --Zoz (t) 17:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] life on titan?

Hi Polonium, would you mind adding a citation to your addition to the Titan (moon) article? Thanks! Debivort 00:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chemical element templates

Hi. I suggested something the Category_talk:Chemical_element_symbol_templates page, so I'd hope that you as a user involved in this could look at the suggestion I put there under your suggestion. Nihiltres 17:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SpywareStrike

SpywareStrike has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 21:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Template cleanup

It seems at some point you created a lot of redirects for chemical elements. None of them are being used after over three months of existence. None of the redirects have any transclusions or links to them; would you object to me deleting them (listed below)? Cheers. --MZMcBride 17:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  
  4.  
  5.  
  6.  
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
No, they are not used, so I have no problem with deleting them. Polonium 19:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Lif

A template you created, Template:Lif, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 02:57, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Suspected persistent organic pollutants

Category:Suspected persistent organic pollutants has been nominated for deletion; you are invited to participate in the deletion discussion located here. – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Heading

A tag has been placed on Template:Heading requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Overwrite

A tag has been placed on Template:Overwrite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Oxide

A tag has been placed on Template:Oxide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Cif

A tag has been placed on Template:Cif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)