Talk:Polmont rail crash

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Polmont rail crash article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
This article is within the scope of the Transport in Scotland WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of transportation in Scotland. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Should this not be referred to as the Polmont accident?

Yep, the official report calls it that, so I've moved it. Goose 18:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, the statement that Push-Pull operations withdrawal was sped up, is open to debate. Push-Pull operation in the Scottish Region was actually expanded after the Polmont accident, with further DBSO's and 47/7 locos converted for use on the Aberdeen to Glasgow services. They were transfered south of the border after the introduction of Class 158 units, and still to this day, the DBSO's are in Push Pull operation.