Talk:Polish Hussars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Why is the information so poor concerning the wings?
The most famous traity of the Hussar (Polish) are thw ings. I would figure half of the article would be dedicated to it. More information. What was the weight? If heavy, it needed a purpose. Are there accounts of seeing it used in battle? Yes no? This would answer if they were ceremonial or not.
-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.113.63 (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merger
Disagree. The Polish Hussars were an important formation both historically and curturaly and deserver their own article.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 02:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, unique, interesting, historically significant; merger would be a waste; I'll start working on it bit by bit - adding things I know and can prove ;-) Might take a while though... - Filutek —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Filutek (talk • contribs) 01:14, August 24, 2007 (UTC).
-WHY RIDER IN THE PICTURES WAS CALLED HUSSAR FROM XVI C? tHIS ARMOUR WAS USED IN LATE XVI ANG XVII.i HALF OF XVI WAS TIME OF RACKA JAZDA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.19.195.146 (talk) 09:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Name
Decapitalize? Polish hussars instead of Polish Hussars seems more sensible.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 22:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Why not Polish Husaria ? It evolved into very unique formation, very different from other kinds of hussars. - Filutek —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Filutek (talk • contribs) 01:23, August 24, 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Unification - compatibility
It would be good to look at all the wiki entries that contain information about Hussars. There is more on Polish Hussars tactics here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussars than in this article. And there is also article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towarzysz_husarski - maybe it should be merged into Polish Hussars. Because information about hussars is spread in those three and any of those contains the full information. I suggest, this should be the main article, of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.226.91 (talk) 01:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)