Talk:Polarity therapy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is being improved by WikiProject Rational Skepticism. Wikiproject Rational Skepticism seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with science, pseudosciences, pseudohistory and skepticism. Please feel free to help us improve this page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. Please visit the project page for more details, or ask questions on talk. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
[edit] Re-hashed article
NPOV'd, extended lead para, cut uneccessary waffle about Stone's "extensive travels", got rid of refs to academic qualifications (a blatant plea for credibility), organised 'description' section (too long) into 'theory' and 'practice'. Famousdog (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] deletion tag by User:Shoemaker's Holiday
I have removed the tag. There are 12 reliable sources cited in this article. "Polarity therapy" gets 298,000 ghits and has 610 google books hits. Ignoring this evidence of notability the tag is still not being used in line with policy.
As per WP:NPOV, section WP:DUE, "Minority views can receive attention on pages specifically devoted to them...".
WP:DELETE/Alternatives to deletion/Editing (WP:ATD} states, "If the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion."
No case has been put why we should ignore both policies in this case. SmithBlue (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
