Polish Defense

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Polish Defense
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Image:chess zver 26.png a8 rd b8 nd c8 bd d8 qd e8 kd f8 bd g8 nd h8 rd Image:chess zver 26.png
a7 pd b7 c7 pd d7 pd e7 pd f7 pd g7 pd h7 pd
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 pd c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 d4 pl e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 pl b2 pl c2 pl d2 e2 pl f2 pl g2 pl h2 pl
a1 rl b1 nl c1 bl d1 ql e1 kl f1 bl g1 nl h1 rl
Image:chess zhor 26.png
Moves 1.d4 b5
ECO A40
Origin Kuhn - Wagner A., Swiss corr. ch. 1913
Named after Polish Opening
Parent Queen's Pawn Game
Chessgames.com opening explorer
This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

The Polish Defense is the name commonly given to one of several sequences of chess opening moves characterized by an early ...b5 by Black. The name "Polish Defense" is given by analogy to the so-called Polish Opening, 1.b4. The original line was

1. d4 b5

as played by Aleksander Wagner, a Polish player and openings analyst, against Kuhn in the 1913 Swiss Correspondence Championship. Wagner published an analysis of the opening in Deutsches Wochenscach in 1914, when he was living in Stanislau, Galicia, Austria-Hungary (now Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine).[1] Later the name was also applied to

1. d4 Nf6
2. Nf3 b5

and other variants where Black delays playing ...b5 until the second or third move, which are sometimes called the Polish Defense Deferred.

With ...b5, Black tries to take control of c4, but 1.d4 b5 is generally considered dubious after 2.e4, threatening 3.Bxb5. Modern Chess Openings (MCO-14, 1999) allots two columns to the Polish, commenting that the variants where Black waits and plays 2...b5 instead of 1...b5 are much safer.[2] Earlier editions of MCO give only a single column of analysis and consider only the 2...b5 lines. MCO-9 (1957), states that the Polish "fails because it neglects the centre".[3] That negative verdict was softened in the next edition, MCO-10 (1965), to say that the Polish "neglects the centre, but is not refuted".[4] MCO-12 (1982) retains the "not refuted" assessment and notes that the Polish can result by transposition from the Réti system.[5] Other judgements have been more harsh. The 1...b5 Polish was deemed "entirely valueless" by I. A. Horowitz in 1964.[6]

Image:chess zhor 22.png
Image:chess zver 22.png a8 rd b8 nd c8 bd d8 qd e8 kd f8 bd g8 h8 rd Image:chess zver 22.png
a7 pd b7 c7 pd d7 pd e7 pd f7 pd g7 pd h7 pd
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 nd g6 h6
a5 b5 pd c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 nl g3 pl h3
a2 pl b2 pl c2 pl d2 pl e2 pl f2 pl g2 h2 pl
a1 rl b1 nl c1 bl d1 ql e1 kl f1 bl g1 h1 rl
Image:chess zhor 22.png
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.g3 b5

The Polish is closely related to the St. George Defence (1.e4 a6, usually followed by 2.d4 b5) into which it often transposes. Boris Spassky played 1.d4 b5 against Tigran Petrosian in the decisive 22nd game of their world championship match in 1966. Spassky equalized as black[7] but rejected an opportunity to draw as he was behind by a point in the match and with at most three games remaining he was practically forced to play for a win. Petrosian won the game, thus ensuring that he would retain his title.[8]

The Polish can be used to combat certain variations of the Réti Opening or King's Indian Attack.[9] In particular, 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.g3 b5 is a fully respectable opening that has been successfully played by former World Champion Anatoly Karpov, among others.[10][11][12] It prepares to fianchetto Black's queen bishop and prevents White from playing the otherwise desirable c4. Note that here 3.e4 would allow 3...Nxe4. White is in any event pretty much committed to fianchettoing his king bishop rather than developing it along the f1-a6 diagonal.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Hooper, David and Kenneth Whyld (1996). "Polish Defence", The Oxford Companion To Chess. Oxford University, p. 313. ISBN 0-19-280049-3. 
  2. ^ De Firmian, Nick (1999). Modern Chess Openings: MCO-14. Random House Puzzles & Games, p. 497. ISBN 0-8129-3084-3. 
  3. ^ Korn, Walter (1957). Modern Chess Openings: Ninth Edition. Pitman Publishing, p. 225. 
  4. ^ Korn, Walter and Larry Evans (1965). Modern Chess Openings: Tenth Edition. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, p. 332. 
  5. ^ Korn, Walter (1982). Modern Chess Openings: Twelfth Edition. David McKay, p. 310. ISBN 0-679-13500-6. 
  6. ^ Horowitz, I. A. (1964). Chess Openings: Theory and Practice. Simon & Schuster, p. 780. ISBN 0-671-20553-6. 
  7. ^ MCO-14, p.503 note (j)
  8. ^ Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian vs Boris Spassky game score. (Chessgames.com)
  9. ^ Chess Opening Explorer: 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. g3 b5. Chessgames.com. Retrieved on 2007-05-02.
  10. ^ Mednis, Edmar (1994). How Karpov Wins, 2nd ed., Dover, p. 128. ISBN 0486278816. 
  11. ^ Saidy v. Karpov, San Antonio 1972. Chessgames.com. Retrieved on 2007-05-02.
  12. ^ Korchnoi v. Karpov, Moscow 1973. Chessgames.com. Retrieved on 2007-05-02.
Wikibooks
Opening theory in chess has related information at