Wikipedia talk:Pokémon Collaborative Project/FFA Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] PKMN FFA

- * Something inside me really wants to see Plusle become a good article. Perhaps it's the Good article. (But it would be alanis if Minun became good first.) --Damian Yerrick (☎) 22:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC) - :They should both be good articles, it would be strange if one was good and the other wasn't. Minun (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- * Mew (Pokémon)--The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 15:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- :Sure, just point out any problems with this article and I'll help you fix them. Minun (talk) 15:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- * Zigzagoon - has good anime, pokédex and videogames, lacks TCG or manga. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 15:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC) - : I don't know much about the manga, but I would be happy to help with the TCG section. Minun (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- * Cleffa
- * Clefable Highway Batman! 20:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- * Poliwhirl
- * Politoed
- * Poliwag Highway Batman! 20:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- - * Bagon, lacking everything, including an image. Highway Batman! 23:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- : I agree, I think that should be our next focused article Minun (マイナン) 10:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- :: It lacks everything, should be our next focused article Minun (マイナン) 15:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- - * Skiploom
- * Jumpluff
- * Sunflora! Poor Sunflora! This article needs lots of work! I think I can do something about it, though. --Cherimu is beautiful! 19:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- * Aipom
- * Wooper Highway Batman! 19:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- * Charmeleon still marked as a stub —M inun Spiderman 19:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- * Croconaw
- * Bayleef Highway Batman! 19:20, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- * Slowpoke: I'll get to rewriting this overly sectionalized mess sometime... Erik the Appreciator 18:43, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- * Seel
- * Krabby And these too. Erik the Appreciator 18:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- * I'd say Skitty. Holy crap, it doesn't conform at all. XD Toastypk 20:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- * Flaaffy could really use some attention. If nobody else is particularly gonzo over it, I may revise and extend it in the next couple of days! --Chuchunezumi 07:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC) - :I went ahead and reformatted the sections to meet the PCP standards. --Chuchunezumi 08:19, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- * Vulpix
- * Ninetails Highway Return to Oz... 13:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- *Pineco is horrible! Literally horrible! Can we expand on this stub of a stub? TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 02:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- ::how's that, i did everything i could in reference to the game and anime, i don't much else about the rest of it, i'll see if i can add some media related stuff Zappernapper 17:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- * Chikorita with all the focus on starters i would think people would have mentioned this earlier. -Zappernapper 18:24, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- *Haunter lacks a "In the video games" section.
- :fixed the sections, but still needs a lot of rewriting. -Zappernapper 17:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- - * Kadabra Umm.. External links not there.. Uri Geller..? Alvin6226 talk 05:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- - * Gengar needs a manga section, but i don't read them, can anyone else put something in? -Zappernapper 17:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- - *Natu: Enough of a stub that it might have used the old Pokemon Adoption Center treatment twice. I'll give this my style of treatment shortly. Erik Jensen (I appreciate talk!) 19:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- :Natu has been pampered, more or less. Now someone should insert that Pokestart template to the top of the page. Erik Jensen (I appreciate talk!) 20:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- *Gyarados: The video games section gives me a headache! Uses many abbreviated obscure terms (to beginners) to describe game strategy in detail. --Brandon Dilbeck 17:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
- - *Silcoon and Cascoon: Hee hee! I gave these two poor articles the titanic rewrites they needed. If there's anything missing, I wouldn't know. Erik Jensen (I appreciate talk!) 22:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- - *Yanma Has almost no references, stubbish sections, and dind't even have pokestart until I added it...--Ac1983fan(yell at me) 19:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misc. FFA

I reommend choosing Max as the next focus article. Thoughts? The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 11:25, 17 May 2006 (UTC) Other Mishaps? This article might need some help. Alvin6226 02:30, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

By the way, that's Max (Pokémon) (obviously). And come to think of it, even Poké Ball and Team Aqua and Team Magma need help. Thoughts?? The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 07:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Max (Pokémon) needs the borrowed Pokémon section removed, and lots more cleanup, so it would thus be good as a miscellena next article--XenoNeon (converse) 11:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Make sure the ugly table of Pokémon is replaced with prose! Please! - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 05:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
The Pokémon character articls are now being taken care of by WP:PAC2, so we should be taking a non-character article. How about Poké Ball or Glitch City?? The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 07:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I think that Pokemon Ranger should be our next focus.--Ac1983fan (talk • contribs) 23:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Let's not do a speculative article if we can at all avoid it. Poké Ball needs a lot of love, Max (Pokémon) needs work despite the presence of WP:PAC2. and all of the glitches still need to be collapsed into a single article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
WHAT?! If the glitches are merged, we need to transwiki the original articles somewhere else. Okay, so they don't belong in an encyclopedia, but they're very informative for people who want to exploit the glitches. And they're much better than their Bulbapedia counterparts. The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 06:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Even Pokémon trainer needs a lot of work. The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 15:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC) The aforementioned article just needs some heavyhanded deletion. The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 11:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Right, lets just all point out all the problems with the article, this way we can find out which is most important, and we can help fix the article. Minun (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
was anyone even aware of this scary thing? i'm not even sure it really deserves it's own page. I'm tempted to speedy delete it unless someone out there thinks they can turn it into something resebling an article. Zappernapper 07:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)