Wikipedia talk:Pokémon Adoption Center 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Pokémon Portal This article is part of WikiProject Pokémon, which aims to improve the encyclopedic coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project, ask for advice, and see what our current focuses are.
Redirect	This article has been rated as Redirect-Class on the assessment scale.
NA	This article is on a subject of NA priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
PCP To-do: edit  Current focuses - Merge and Clean Lists Cleanup - Various Articles. Expand - Stubs. Assess and Prioritize articles (Log)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wikipedia:Pokémon Adoption Center 2 page.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming

Shortcut: WT:PAC2

Archives
Current talk - 15 May onwards

Contents 1 A few questions regarding PAC2 2 Image discussion 3 Headings or Bold names? 4 banners 5 Integration with {{cvgproj}} 6 ????

[edit] A few questions regarding PAC2

• Are we abbreviating to PAC2? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • If it makes you happy. I am. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Should we consider ourselves a stand alone project, or be a daughter project to the PCP? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • The latter. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Should we have our own userboxes, tags, stub notices and welcome notes? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • God no. We only need one set of those. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Should we have all Poké-related AfD/GA/FAC/PR articles noted here, or just character ones? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Character articles only. This is like the old PAC, only for human characters instead of Pokémon. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Should we have a collaboration article? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah, this is a "Give me a job" project like the last one. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Are we covering gym leader articles? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Emphatically yes. They need a lot of love, mostly in the form of removal of cruft and merging. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Are we for or against wikitables? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, I mostly despise them, especially those ugly ones everyone seems to be using for Pokémon teams. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Should I stop now? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Now is good. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image discussion

Crossposted from Talk:Max (Pokémon)

Was trawling through articles and found two suitable images for the Ralts section of this article. First of all there is Image:Snorunt.png, the current image in the article. This show Snorunt, Max and Ralts together, with Ralts now in the center, but very good conveying the Ralts/Max bond. The other one I found was Image:AG278.jpg, an image of Max and Ralts hugging each other. While this is a bigger version of Ralts, I don't really like the back ground, and it isn't as obvious that Max is caring for Ralts. Thoughts? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 12:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Headings or Bold names?

Why do we need to use a subheading for every Pokémon a character's ever owned? It just clogs up the Table of Contents. The Raven's Apprentice (Call) 10:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

The bolding looks stupid. Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 10:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] banners

Please leave the WP:CVG banner on the talk pages. They automatically classify an article for the Wikipedia 1.0 project. If you could put {{cvgproj|class=|importance=}} back on any pages that they have been removed from, that would be appreciated. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 07:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Integration with {{cvgproj}}

A request has been made at WikiProject Computer and video games talk to integrate the {{PCP}} template into the CVG header itself. The newly integrated template can be seen here: User:Hbdragon88/Temp. Thoughts? Objections? --PresN 16:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ????

I haven't worked on the progect in a couple of months. I can't believe it got shut down. So what happened to have it shut down???? Bobcheezy 22:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Eh, everyone, including me, sort of lost interest. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 23:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)