Talk:Pokot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Africa This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Africa, which collaborates on articles related to Africa in Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Kenya. See also The Kenya Portal.
This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda. See also the Uganda WikiPortal.
Zuni girl; photograph by Edward S. Curtis, 1903 This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.

Unsourced info from Suk tribe:

The word "Suk", as used to refer to the Pokot tribe, it was a result of English colonial visitors to the area now in northwest Kenya, who asked residents to tell them their name.
From caution, not wanting to give a stranger a personal name that might give them some power over them, each person asked would respond, "My name is Msuk", which, in Pokot means, "log" or "large felled tree".
The English, hearing this name again and again, applied it to all residents of the Pokot region.

mark 08:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] changes

I have made a few changes in this stub. The Pokot are not Kalenjin. This is a mistake made by the British who did not know how to 'classify' people. They prefered putting them within a group which is in itself a fabrication, more than a real family of ethnic groups. The affirmation that pokot and nandi belong to the same ethnic background is acceptable only if one agrees that chinese and algerian people belong to the same family. --Beppevec (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)