User talk:Pnswmr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Pnswmr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Figma 18:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Waite Phillips
Why did you ask for an assessment on this if you changed the rating yourself? I don't quite consider it a B-class myself. The lead is only 1-2 lines and it has no inline refs. Rlevse 02:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] reverted Waite Phillips
Please see the article talk page for reasons, it should be discussed there if/before it reverts back. Sorry, I know you worked hard on it. Studerby 05:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
 Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007 |
|
Congratulations to our 225 new members |
The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below) We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page
Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network: Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up.
|
|
Complete To Do List
Assessment Progress
|
|
|
|
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .
[edit] Bad CSD tagging
Hi. You tagged Magic club for speedy deletion under criterion A1. I have removed the tag from the article because it does not meet the criterion specified, because the article gave enough information explaining the topic, and qualifies as a stub. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging articles for deletion under particular criterions. Thank you, Spebi 06:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Tubman Elementary School
An editor has nominated Tubman Elementary School, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tubman Elementary School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Giuliani's law
It isn't in use on the web; they created it some hours ago here - it's clearly a neologism that few people know, at least, even if not ridiculous. -- Mentifisto 01:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Naval trawler
Within 60 seconds of creating a stub for this topic I find you have splashed across the page a patronising message saying "The tone or style of this article or section may not be appropriate for Wikipedia" and referring me to Wikipedia's "guide to writing better articles". What are your specific concerns? --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] jargon comment
pnswmr, you have put a 'jargon' label on the relational order theory page without, as far as I know, having read any of the references, or conducted any inquiry into the subject matter. What may appear unfamiliar to someone not involved in a subject matter is not necessarily jargon. I suggest you be more careful about invoking perjorative commentary. Ordermaven (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
